140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33520195)
1. The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities.
Maryl M; Błaszczyńska M; Szulińska A; Rams P
F1000Res; 2020; 9():1265. PubMed ID: 33520195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery.
Achenbach K; Błaszczyńska M; De Paoli S; Di Donato F; Dumouchel S; Forbes P; Kraker P; Vignoli M
Open Res Eur; 2022; 2():28. PubMed ID: 37645282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities.
Sivertsen G
Scientometrics; 2016; 107():357-368. PubMed ID: 27122643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open Science Training in TRIPLE.
Provost L; Di Donato F; Tóth-Czifra E; Dumouchel S; Blotière E; Chen Y
Open Res Eur; 2023; 3():39. PubMed ID: 37645498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?
Baffy G; Burns MM; Hoffmann B; Ramani S; Sabharwal S; Borus JF; Pories S; Quan SF; Ingelfinger JR
Am J Med; 2020 Jan; 133(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 31419421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is social sciences and humanities (SSH) premedical education marginalized in the medical school admission process? A review and contextualization of the literature.
Hall JN; Woods N; Hanson MD
Acad Med; 2014 Jul; 89(7):1075-86. PubMed ID: 24826852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics in the dynamic of scientific field: challenges in the building of guidelines for social sciences and humanities.
Guerriero IC; Bosi ML
Cien Saude Colet; 2015 Sep; 20(9):2615-24. PubMed ID: 26331493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scholarly Publishing in the Wake of COVID-19.
Miller RC; Tsai CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Oct; 108(2):491-495. PubMed ID: 32890542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists.
Gupta L; Gasparyan AY; Zimba O; Misra DP
Rheumatol Int; 2020 Dec; 40(12):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 33048199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: the decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars.
Albert M; Paradis E; Kuper A
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Feb; 126():17-25. PubMed ID: 25500163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage.
Kramer B; Bosman J
F1000Res; 2016; 5():692. PubMed ID: 27429740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers.
Chiarelli A; Johnson R; Pinfield S; Richens E
F1000Res; 2019; 8():971. PubMed ID: 32055396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Words by the tail: Assessing lexical diversity in scholarly titles using frequency-rank distribution tail fits.
Bérubé N; Sainte-Marie M; Mongeon P; Larivière V
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0197775. PubMed ID: 29985920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An agenda for future Social Sciences and Humanities research on energy efficiency: 100 priority research questions.
Foulds C; Royston S; Berker T; Nakopoulou E; Bharucha ZP; Robison R; Abram S; Ančić B; Arapostathis S; Badescu G; Bull R; Cohen J; Dunlop T; Dunphy N; Dupont C; Fischer C; Gram-Hanssen K; Grandclément C; Heiskanen E; Labanca N; Jeliazkova M; Jörgens H; Keller M; Kern F; Lombardi P; Mourik R; Ornetzeder M; Pearson PJG; Rohracher H; Sahakian M; Sari R; Standal K; Živčič L
Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 2022; 9(1):223. PubMed ID: 35791377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring researchers' potential scholarly impact with structural variations: Four types of researchers in information science (1979-2018).
Hou J; Yang X; Chen C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234347. PubMed ID: 32569295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.
Tennant JP; Waldner F; Jacques DC; Masuzzo P; Collister LB; Hartgerink CH
F1000Res; 2016; 5():632. PubMed ID: 27158456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature.
Vadrot ABM; Rankovic A; Lapeyre R; Aubert PM; Laurans Y
Innovation (Abingdon); 2018; 31("Suppl 1"):78-100. PubMed ID: 29706803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility.
Hrynaszkiewicz I
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():319-348. PubMed ID: 31691858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection.
Perko T; Van Oudheusden M; Turcanu C; Pölzl-Viol C; Oughton D; Schieber C; Schneider T; Zölzer F; Mays C; Martell M; Baudé S; Choffel de Witte I; Prlic I; Cantone MC; Salomaa S; Duranova T; Economides S; Molyneux-Hodgson S
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Sep; 39(3):766-784. PubMed ID: 30865935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The move to open: medical library leadership in scholarly communication.
Shaffer C
J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 33424459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
