BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33520497)

  • 1. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
    Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
    Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
    Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
    Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Efficiency of Cervical Pap and Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology: A Review.
    Dasgupta S
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48343. PubMed ID: 38060751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
    Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.
    Strander B; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I; Rådberg T; Ryd W
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study between liquid-based cytology & conventional Pap smear for cytological follow up of treated patients of cancer cervix.
    Singh U; ; Qureshi S; Negi N; Singh N; Goel M; Srivastava K
    Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):263-267. PubMed ID: 29923515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
    Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional Papanicolaou smears in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
    Haghighi F; Ghanbarzadeh N; Ataee M; Sharifzadeh G; Mojarrad JS; Najafi-Semnani F
    Adv Biomed Res; 2016; 5():162. PubMed ID: 27995101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
    Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
    Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Nicolau SM; Stávale JN; Focchi J; Castelo A; Dôres GB; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Lorincz A; Rodrigues de Lima G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
    Karnon J; Peters J; Platt J; Chilcott J; McGoogan E; Brewer N
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78. PubMed ID: 15147611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting uterine glandular lesions: Role of cervical cytology.
    Bansal B; Gupta P; Gupta N; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
    Cytojournal; 2016; 13():3. PubMed ID: 27014363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
    Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.
    Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S
    Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Samples from Conventional Smear versus Liquid-Based Cytology in Uterine Cervical Cancer Screening Test.
    Jeong H; Hong SR; Chae SW; Jin SY; Yoon HK; Lee J; Kim EK; Ha ST; Kim SN; Park EJ; Jung JJ; Sung SH; Lim SC
    J Pathol Transl Med; 2017 May; 51(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 28415159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the Cellslide
    Michelow P; Sherrin A; Rossouw L; Mohaleamolla S; Evans D; Swarts A; Rakhombe N; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
    Afr J Lab Med; 2016; 5(1):278. PubMed ID: 28879102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
    Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.