These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33522293)

  • 1. Can barb thread design improve the pullout strength of bone screws?
    Feng X; Qi W; Fang CX; Lu WW; Leung FKL; Chen B
    Bone Joint Res; 2021 Feb; 10(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 33522293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and initial validation of a novel thread design for nonlocking cancellous screws.
    Feng X; Zhang S; Luo Z; Liang H; Chen B; Leung F
    J Orthop Res; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2813-2821. PubMed ID: 35267202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews.
    Gracco A; Giagnorio C; Incerti Parenti S; Alessandri Bonetti G; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 22858327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.
    Chapman JR; Harrington RM; Lee KM; Anderson PA; Tencer AF; Kowalski D
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 8872262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of the undercut thread design
    Liu F; Feng X; Zheng J; Leung F; Chen B
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1019172. PubMed ID: 36394045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical prediction of pullout strengths for dental and orthopaedic screws with conical profile and buttress threads.
    Shih KS; Hou SM; Lin SC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():159-164. PubMed ID: 29054257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of the pullout strength of cervical screws.
    Conrad BP; Cordista AG; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Dec; 18(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 16306839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pullout strengths of cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws.
    Thompson JD; Benjamin JB; Szivek JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Aug; (341):241-9. PubMed ID: 9269180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength in synthetic bones: Effects of screw shape, core/thread profile and cement augmentation.
    Liu MY; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Hsieh MK; Chen LH; Tai CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229328. PubMed ID: 32084219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Fastener With Improved Bone-To-Implant Interface Shows Superior Torque Stripping Resistance Compared With the Standard Buttress Screw.
    Alfonso NA; Baldini T; Stahel PF
    J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Apr; 33(4):e137-e142. PubMed ID: 30893221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and initial validation of a novel undercut thread design for locking screws.
    Feng X; Zhang S; Liang H; Chen B; Leung F
    Injury; 2022 Jul; 53(7):2533-2540. PubMed ID: 35249737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study.
    Kim YY; Choi WS; Rhyu KW
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22336467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of compact versus standard flute drill bits, and interlocking versus buttress thread self-tapping cortical bone screws in cadaveric equine third metacarpal condyle.
    Pye JL; Garcia TC; Kapatkin AS; Samol MA; Stover S
    Vet Surg; 2023 Nov; 52(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 37302003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.
    Abshire BB; McLain RF; Valdevit A; Kambic HE
    Spine J; 2001; 1(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 14588297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pullout strength of 2.0 mm cancellous and cortical screws in synthetic bone.
    Moser JE; Kunkel KAR; Gerard PD
    Vet Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(8):1110-1115. PubMed ID: 28817191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
    Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18391719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models.
    Patel PS; Shepherd DE; Hukins DW
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Oct; 32(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 20558097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Larger screw diameter may not guarantee greater pullout strength for headless screws - a biomechanical study.
    Lin CC; Lin KJ; Chen WC; Wei HW; Lin KP; Tsai CL
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 May; 62(3):257-261. PubMed ID: 27341556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pullout performance of self-tapping medical screws.
    Wu Z; Nassar SA; Yang X
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Nov; 133(11):111002. PubMed ID: 22168734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.