98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3352248)
21. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
Poissant SF; Whitmal NA; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.
Garcia Lecumberri ML; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2445-54. PubMed ID: 16642857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
Rao MD; Letowski T
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On cross-language consonant identification in second language noise.
Marchegiani L; Fafoutis X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2206-9. PubMed ID: 26520302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3241-51. PubMed ID: 16334903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
