These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33524267)

  • 41. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
    Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Investigating the Effects of Four Auditory Profiles on Speech Recognition, Overall Quality, and Noise Annoyance With Simulated Hearing-Aid Processing Strategies.
    Wu M; Sanchez-Lopez R; El-Haj-Ali M; Nielsen SG; Fereczkowski M; Dau T; Santurette S; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520960861. PubMed ID: 33073727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
    Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.
    Reinten I; De Ronde-Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014437. PubMed ID: 34027725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid.
    Humes LE; Christensen L; Thomas T; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A; Bentler R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 10025544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Sundewall-Thorén E; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S91-8. PubMed ID: 19012116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing Real-Life Benefit From Hearing-Aid Noise Management: SSQ12 Questionnaire Versus Ecological Momentary Assessment With Acoustic Data-Logging.
    Andersson KE; Andersen LS; Christensen JH; Neher T
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 30(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 33375840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):457-467. PubMed ID: 29381097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.
    van Schoonhoven J; Schulte M; Boymans M; Wagener KC; Dreschler WA; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jul; 20():. PubMed ID: 27460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Listening Effort in School-Aged Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally: Examining the Effects of a Personal, Digital Remote Microphone System and a Contralateral Routing of Signal System.
    Oosthuizen I; Picou EM; Pottas L; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520984700. PubMed ID: 33602042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predictors of aided speech recognition, with and without frequency compression, in older adults.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):467-75. PubMed ID: 25751599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Speech Perception and Dichotic Listening Are Associated With Hearing Thresholds and Cognition, Respectively, in Unaided Presbycusis.
    Torrente MC; Vergara R; Moreno-Gómez FN; Leiva A; San Martin S; Belkhiria C; Marcenaro B; Delgado C; Delano PH
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2022; 14():786330. PubMed ID: 35283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.