These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33524851)

  • 1. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for the statistical interpretation of friction ridge skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford HJ; Koertner AJ; Zemp F; Ausdemore M; Liu A; Salyards MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():113-126. PubMed ID: 29655097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Aug; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.
    Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 23313600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
    Anthonioz A; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results.
    Monson KL; Roberts MA; Knorr KB; Ali S; Meagher SB; Biggs K; Blume P; Brandelli D; Marzioli A; Reneau R; Tarasi F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():111-131. PubMed ID: 30784948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative practise in forensic science and academia: The development of a documentation strategy for fingerprint examinations in an English fingerprint bureau in the ISO 17025 era.
    Megan Needham ; Fieldhouse S; Morris W; Wheeler J; Nicholls G
    Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):336-348. PubMed ID: 35598926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual dimorphism in finger ridge breadth measurements: a tool for sex estimation from fingerprints.
    Mundorff AZ; Bartelink EJ; Murad TA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):891-7. PubMed ID: 24673752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex estimation from fingerprint ridge density. A review of literature.
    Sharma S; Shrestha R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Acta Biomed; 2021 Nov; 92(5):e2021366. PubMed ID: 34738574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On relative distortion in fingerprint comparison.
    Kalka ND; Hicklin RA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():78-84. PubMed ID: 25216456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal study of fingerprint recognition.
    Yoon S; Jain AK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(28):8555-60. PubMed ID: 26124106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: a field study.
    Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I; Langenburg G; Kostroski J; Skerrett JE; Koolen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):32-46. PubMed ID: 21640531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a Turkish young adult population: a sample of Baskent University.
    Oktem H; Kurkcuoglu A; Pelin IC; Yazici AC; Aktaş G; Altunay F
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 May; 32():34-8. PubMed ID: 25882147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.