166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33525073)
1. Contrast Induced Nephropathy and 2-Year Outcomes of Iso-Osmolar Compared with Low-Osmolar Contrast Media after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Du M; Jiang L; Tang X; Gao Z; Xu B; Yuan J
Korean Circ J; 2021 Feb; 51(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 33525073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-Term Adverse Effects of Low-Osmolar Compared With Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media After Coronary Angiography.
Wang YC; Tang A; Chang D; Lu CQ; Zhang SJ; Ju S
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 118(7):985-90. PubMed ID: 27521223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine iso-osmolar contrast media use and acute kidney injury following percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Premawardhana D; Sekar B; Ul-Haq MZ; Sheikh A; Gallagher S; Anderson R; Copt S; Ossei-Gerning N; Kinnaird T
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2019 Oct; 67(5):380-391. PubMed ID: 31527583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast media use in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Pandya B; Chalhoub JM; Parikh V; Gaddam S; Spagnola J; El-Sayegh S; Bogin M; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Bangalore S
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 228():137-144. PubMed ID: 27863354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iso-osmolar vs low-osmolar contrast agents for coronary optical coherence tomography: a blinded prospective randomized controlled study.
Kostantinis S; Mastrodemos O; Stanberry L; Sandoval Y; Allana SS; Mutlu D; Simsek B; Rempakos A; Karacsonyi J; Alexandrou M; Okeson BK; Burke MN; Rangan BV; Brilakis ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 36(6):. PubMed ID: 38446023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao F; Lei R; Yang SK; Luo M; Cheng W; Xiao YQ; Li XW; Guo J; Duan SB
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 31215488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different outcomes between iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media in acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment.
Oh S; Kim JS; Ahn Y; Ahn JH; Hyun DY; Lee SH; Cho KH; Kim MC; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Kim JH; Jeong MH
Cardiol J; 2023; 30(5):790-798. PubMed ID: 34931692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study.
Lee T; Kim WK; Kim AJ; Ro H; Chang JH; Lee HH; Chung W; Jung JY
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():862023. PubMed ID: 35572997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.
Esplugas E; Cequier A; Gomez-Hospital JA; Del Blanco BG; Jara F
Drug Saf; 2002; 25(15):1079-98. PubMed ID: 12452733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High incidence of nephropathy in neurosurgical patients after intra-arterial administration of low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media.
Serafin Z; Karolkiewicz M; Gruszka M; Strózecki P; Lasek W; Odrowaz-Sypniewska G; Manitius J; Beuth W
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 21498279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media.
Azzalini L; Vilca LM; Lombardo F; Poletti E; Laricchia A; Beneduce A; Maccagni D; Demir OM; Slavich M; Giannini F; Carlino M; Margonato A; Cappelletti A; Colombo A
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 273():69-73. PubMed ID: 30196995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Major Adverse Renal and Cardiovascular Events following Intra-Arterial Contrast Media Administration in Hospitalized Patients with Comorbid Conditions.
McCullough P; Ng CS; Ryan M; Baker ER; Mehta R
Cardiorenal Med; 2021; 11(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 34433166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the VA CART Program.
Jovin IS; Warsavage TJ; Plomondon ME; Grunwald GK; Waldo SW; Rao SV; Brilakis ES; Azzalini L
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jul; 100(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 35500170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of contrast-medium-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients undergoing MDCT--a pooled analysis of two randomized trials.
Thomsen HS; Morcos SK
Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):891-7. PubMed ID: 19002467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative Nephrotoxicity of Different Contrast Media.
Aqeel I; Garcha AS; Rudnick MR
Interv Cardiol Clin; 2014 Jul; 3(3):349-356. PubMed ID: 28582219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A meta-analysis of the renal safety of isosmolar iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media.
McCullough PA; Bertrand ME; Brinker JA; Stacul F
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Aug; 48(4):692-9. PubMed ID: 16904536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-induced nephropathy: are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?
Morcos SK
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 19348841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial.
Jo SH; Youn TJ; Koo BK; Park JS; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Chung WY; Joo GW; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Oh BH; Lee MM; Park YB; Kim HS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 16949481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]