208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33526299)
1. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Region in 15 Patients by Cone Beam Computed Tomography at a Single Center in South India.
Murugesan A; Dinesh SPS; Muthuswamy Pandian S; Ashwin Solanki L; Alshehri A; Awadh W; Alzahrani KJ; Alsharif KF; Alnfiai MM; Mathew R; El-Bialy T; Baeshen HA; Bhandi S; Raj AT; Patil S
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Oct; 28():e937949. PubMed ID: 36284468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Safe zones of the maxillary posterior area for mini-implant insertion in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion].
Liao Q; Wang YJ; Zhang WY; Zhou D; Fan XP
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Aug; 27(4):370-375. PubMed ID: 30483703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positional guidelines for orthodontic mini-implant placement in the anterior alveolar region: a systematic review.
Alsamak S; Psomiadis S; Gkantidis N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):470-9. PubMed ID: 23527349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.
Lyu X; Guo J; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu L; Pu L; Lai W; Long H
Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):516-523. PubMed ID: 33378492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement.
Lee KJ; Joo E; Kim KD; Lee JS; Park YC; Yu HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19361735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical assessment by cone beam computed tomography with the use of lateral cephalograms to analyse the vertical bone height of the anterior palate for orthodontic mini-implants.
Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Chhatwani S; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Danesh G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 32608152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary alveolar cortical bone thickness and density using computed tomography imaging.
Ohiomoba H; Sonis A; Yansane A; Friedland B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 28024789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.
Kim HJ; Yun HS; Park HD; Kim DH; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 16905061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.
Vera C; De Kok IJ; Reinhold D; Limpiphipatanakorn P; Yap AK; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1514-9. PubMed ID: 23189304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam computed tomography and digital model analysis of maxillary buccal alveolar bone thickness for vertical temporary skeletal anchorage device placement.
Giap HV; Lee JY; Nguyen H; Chae HS; Kim YH; Shin JW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):e429-e438. PubMed ID: 35346539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
