These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33526396)

  • 1. The Hip-Spine Relationship: The Importance of Femoral Version.
    Padgett DE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S99-S103. PubMed ID: 33526396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion.
    Bargar WL; Jamali AA; Nejad AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Range of Motion to Impingement Curves Create a New Patient-Specific Impingement-Free Zone for Acetabular Cup Placement.
    McCarthy TF; Thompson MT; Nevelos J; Salem HS; Naylor BH; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():400-406. PubMed ID: 33565600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simplifying the Hip-Spine Relationship for Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Do I Need to Do Differently Intraoperatively?
    Padgett DE
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S71-S73. PubMed ID: 30718173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal Fusion Is Associated With Changes in Acetabular Orientation and Reductions in Pelvic Mobility.
    Bernstein J; Charette R; Sloan M; Lee GC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):324-330. PubMed ID: 30794220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Dennis DA; Smith GH; Phillips JLH; Ennis HE; Jennings JM; Plaskos C; Pierrepont JW
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S257-S264. PubMed ID: 37100096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.
    Emerson RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):477-81. PubMed ID: 21786055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
    Amuwa C; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Influence Femoroacetabular Flexion in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Esposito CI; Miller TT; Kim HJ; Barlow BT; Wright TM; Padgett DE; Jerabek SA; Mayman DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 474(8):1788-97. PubMed ID: 27020429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of a Degenerative Spine and Adverse Pelvic Mobility on Prosthetic Impingement in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Gu YM; Kim W; Pierrepont JW; Li Q; Shimmin AJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2523-2529. PubMed ID: 33692000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Component Position and Metal Ion Levels in Computer-Navigated Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Mann SM; Kunz M; Ellis RE; Rudan JF
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 27430186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama K; Shibuya T
    Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 29275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impingement with total hip replacement.
    Malik A; Maheshwari A; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1832-42. PubMed ID: 17671025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hip Resurfacing Using Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene: Prospective Study Results at 8.5 Years.
    Pritchett JW
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2203-8. PubMed ID: 27067469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
    Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.