BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33526975)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery for patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.
    Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Yoo JG; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 33526975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.
    Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(10):2204-2208. PubMed ID: 33859528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
    Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of surgical approach on risk of recurrence after vaginal brachytherapy in early-stage high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer.
    Philp L; Tannenbaum S; Haber H; Saini A; Laurent JS; James K; Feltmate CM; Russo AL; Growdon WB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 160(2):389-395. PubMed ID: 33358198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
    Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
    Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.
    Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu C; Lund K; Iachina M; Korsholm M; Jensen PT
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 30810740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.
    Segarra-Vidal B; Dinoi G; Zorrilla-Vaca A; Mariani A; Student V; Garcia NA; Llueca Abella A; Ramirez PT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 34735382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
    Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.
    Borgfeldt C; Holmberg E; Marcickiewicz J; Stålberg K; Tholander B; Lundqvist EÅ; Flöter-Rådestad A; Bjurberg M; Dahm-Kähler P; Hellman K; Hjerpe E; Kjölhede P; Rosenberg P; Högberg T
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):658. PubMed ID: 34078319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
    Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Padilla-Iserte P; Lago V; Tauste C; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver R; Coronado P; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Gilabert-Estellés J; Lorenzo C; Cazorla E; Roldán-Rivas F; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Sánchez L; Muruzábal JC; Hervas D; Domingo S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):65.e1-65.e11. PubMed ID: 32693096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Survival and Recurrence Outcomes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Surgery.
    Park HK; Helenowski IB; Berry E; Lurain JR; Neubauer NL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 25922108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.