BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33527341)

  • 1. Causal interaction trees: Finding subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects in observational data.
    Yang J; Dahabreh IJ; Steingrimsson JA
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):624-635. PubMed ID: 33527341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
    Zivich PN; Breskin A
    Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.
    Zhong Y; Kennedy EH; Bodnar LM; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 190(12):2690-2699. PubMed ID: 34268567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intervention treatment distributions that depend on the observed treatment process and model double robustness in causal survival analysis.
    Wen L; Marcus JL; Young JG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):509-523. PubMed ID: 36597699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance estimation for the average treatment effects on the treated and on the controls.
    Matsouaka RA; Liu Y; Zhou Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 36476035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.
    Rudolph KE; Díaz I; Rosenblum M; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):737-48. PubMed ID: 25190679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast bootstrap algorithm for causal inference with large data.
    Kosko M; Wang L; Santacatterina M
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(15):2894-2927. PubMed ID: 38738397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial.
    Smith MJ; Mansournia MA; Maringe C; Zivich PN; Cole SR; Leyrat C; Belot A; Rachet B; Luque-Fernandez MA
    Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(2):407-432. PubMed ID: 34713468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subgroup identification using covariate-adjusted interaction trees.
    Steingrimsson JA; Yang J
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):3974-3984. PubMed ID: 31162690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric inverse-probability-weighted estimators based on the highly adaptive lasso.
    Ertefaie A; Hejazi NS; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1029-1041. PubMed ID: 35839293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal inference for recurrent event data using pseudo-observations.
    Su CL; Platt RW; Plante JF
    Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 32432686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doubly-robust methods for differences in restricted mean lifetimes using pseudo-observations.
    Choi S; Choi T; Lee HY; Han SW; Bandyopadhyay D
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1185-1198. PubMed ID: 35524651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies.
    Robertson SE; Leith A; Schmid CH; Dahabreh IJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1088-1100. PubMed ID: 33083822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.
    Chatton A; Borgne FL; Leyrat C; Foucher Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 34861799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining machine learning and propensity score weighting to estimate causal effects in multivalued treatments.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):871-881. PubMed ID: 27421786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.