These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33528562)

  • 1. Long Branch Attraction Biases in Phylogenetics.
    Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jun; 70(4):838-843. PubMed ID: 33528562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood inference of small trees in the presence of long branches.
    Parks SL; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):798-811. PubMed ID: 24996414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large sample approximations of probabilities of correct evolutionary tree estimation and biases of maximum likelihood estimation.
    Susko E
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 10. PubMed ID: 21381435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-branch attraction bias and inconsistency in Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e7891. PubMed ID: 20011052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics.
    Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian long branch attraction bias and corrections.
    Susko E
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 25432892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long branch effects distort maximum likelihood phylogenies in simulations despite selection of the correct model.
    Kück P; Mayer C; Wägele JW; Misof B
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36593. PubMed ID: 22662120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can quartet analyses combining maximum likelihood estimation and Hennigian logic overcome long branch attraction in phylogenomic sequence data?
    Kück P; Wilkinson M; Groß C; Foster PG; Wägele JW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183393. PubMed ID: 28841676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Relative Importance of Modeling Site Pattern Heterogeneity Versus Partition-Wise Heterotachy in Phylogenomic Inference.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2019 Nov; 68(6):1003-1019. PubMed ID: 31140564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Use of Information Criteria for Model Selection in Phylogenetics.
    Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Feb; 37(2):549-562. PubMed ID: 31688943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics.
    Philippe H; Zhou Y; Brinkmann H; Rodrigue N; Delsuc F
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():50. PubMed ID: 16209710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-Branch Attraction in Species Tree Estimation: Inconsistency of Partitioned Likelihood and Topology-Based Summary Methods.
    Roch S; Nute M; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2019 Mar; 68(2):281-297. PubMed ID: 30247732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Over-parameterization a Problem for Profile Mixture Models?
    Baños H; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2024 May; 73(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 37843172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana).
    Chan KO; Hutter CR; Wood PL; Grismer LL; Brown RM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Oct; 151():106899. PubMed ID: 32590046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should we be worried about long-branch attraction in real data sets? Investigations using metazoan 18S rDNA.
    Anderson FE; Swofford DL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Nov; 33(2):440-51. PubMed ID: 15336677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The problem of rooting rapid radiations.
    Shavit L; Penny D; Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Nov; 24(11):2400-11. PubMed ID: 17720690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.