These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33529182)

  • 1. Testing the effect of pollen exine rupture on metabarcoding with Illumina sequencing.
    Swenson SJ; Gemeinholzer B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245611. PubMed ID: 33529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures.
    Bell KL; Burgess KS; Botsch JC; Dobbs EK; Read TD; Brosi BJ
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):431-455. PubMed ID: 30118180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers.
    Fahner NA; Shokralla S; Baird DJ; Hajibabaei M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157505. PubMed ID: 27310720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions.
    Pornon A; Escaravage N; Burrus M; Holota H; Khimoun A; Mariette J; Pellizzari C; Iribar A; Etienne R; Taberlet P; Vidal M; Winterton P; Zinger L; Andalo C
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27282. PubMed ID: 27255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology.
    Bell KL; Burgess KS; Okamoto KC; Aranda R; Brosi BJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():110-6. PubMed ID: 26751251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects.
    Bell KL; de Vere N; Keller A; Richardson RT; Gous A; Burgess KS; Brosi BJ
    Genome; 2016 Sep; 59(9):629-40. PubMed ID: 27322652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental quantification of pollen with DNA metabarcoding using ITS1 and trnL.
    Baksay S; Pornon A; Burrus M; Mariette J; Andalo C; Escaravage N
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4202. PubMed ID: 32144370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil.
    Timpano EK; Scheible MKR; Meiklejohn KA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231436. PubMed ID: 32298321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection.
    Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA barcoding methods for land plants.
    Fazekas AJ; Kuzmina ML; Newmaster SG; Hollingsworth PM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 858():223-52. PubMed ID: 22684959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the efficacy of sample collection approaches and DNA metabarcoding for identifying the diversity of plants utilized by nectivorous bats.
    Edwards CE; Swift JF; Lance RF; Minckley TA; Lindsay DL
    Genome; 2019 Jan; 62(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 30481069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences.
    Hawkins J; de Vere N; Griffith A; Ford CR; Allainguillaume J; Hegarty MJ; Baillie L; Adams-Groom B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134735. PubMed ID: 26308362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA metabarcoding data unveils invisible pollination networks.
    Pornon A; Andalo C; Burrus M; Escaravage N
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16828. PubMed ID: 29203872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals.
    Coissac E; Riaz T; Puillandre N
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(8):1834-47. PubMed ID: 22486822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replacing Sanger with Next Generation Sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants.
    Wilkinson MJ; Szabo C; Ford CS; Yarom Y; Croxford AE; Camp A; Gooding P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46040. PubMed ID: 28401958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-skimming provides accurate quantification for pollen mixtures.
    Lang D; Tang M; Hu J; Zhou X
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1433-1446. PubMed ID: 31325909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.
    Keller A; Danner N; Grimmer G; Ankenbrand M; von der Ohe K; von der Ohe W; Rost S; Härtel S; Steffan-Dewenter I
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2015 Mar; 17(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 25270225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microfluidic Enrichment Barcoding (MEBarcoding): a new method for high throughput plant DNA barcoding.
    Gostel MR; Zúñiga JD; Kress WJ; Funk VA; Puente-Lelievre C
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8701. PubMed ID: 32457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA barcoding of arid wild plants using rbcL gene sequences.
    Bafeel SO; Arif IA; Bakir MA; Al Homaidan AA; Al Farhan AH; Khan HA
    Genet Mol Res; 2012 Jul; 11(3):1934-41. PubMed ID: 22869548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. trnL outperforms rbcL as a DNA metabarcoding marker when compared with the observed plant component of the diet of wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus, Primates).
    Mallott EK; Garber PA; Malhi RS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199556. PubMed ID: 29944686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.