179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33529402)
1. Comparison of different methods of retinal imaging for the screening of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.
Kárason KT; Vo D; Grauslund J; Rasmussen ML
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 100(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 33529402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultra-wide-field angiography improves the detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy.
Wessel MM; Aaker GD; Parlitsis G; Cho M; D'Amico DJ; Kiss S
Retina; 2012 Apr; 32(4):785-91. PubMed ID: 22080911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-Field Non-Mydriatic Fundus Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hu J; Chen R; Lu Y; Dou X; Ye B; Cai Z; Pu Z; Mou L
Ophthalmic Res; 2019; 62(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 31067550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging With Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Aiello LP; Odia I; Glassman AR; Melia M; Jampol LM; Bressler NM; Kiss S; Silva PS; Wykoff CC; Sun JK;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 137(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30347105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Handheld Retinal Imaging with ETDRS 7-Standard Field Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema.
Salongcay RP; Aquino LAC; Salva CMG; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Sun JK; Peto T; Silva PS
Ophthalmol Retina; 2022 Jul; 6(7):548-556. PubMed ID: 35278726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disparity of microaneurysm count between ultrawide field colour imaging and ultrawide field fluorescein angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.
Ashraf M; Sampani K; AbdelAl O; Fleming A; Cavallerano J; Souka A; El Baha SM; Silva PS; Sun J; Aiello LP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 104(12):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 32111607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the single, two and three field digital retinal photography for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Govinda A; de Verteuil R
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2011; 9(16):491-537. PubMed ID: 27820519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
Verma A; Alagorie AR; Ramasamy K; van Hemert J; Yadav NK; Pappuru RR; Tufail A; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Raman R;
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 31989286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-mydriatic ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with dilated fundal examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in Chinese individuals with diabetes mellitus.
Szeto SKH; Wong R; Lok J; Tang F; Sun Z; Tso T; Lam TCH; Tham CC; Ng DS; Cheung CY
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 103(9):1327-1331. PubMed ID: 30381391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale.
Domalpally A; Barrett N; Reimers J; Blodi B
Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100029. PubMed ID: 36249302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Widefield Laser Ophthalmoscopy and ETDRS Retinal Area for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Ashraf M; Hock KM; Cavallerano JD; Wang FL; Silva PS
Ophthalmol Sci; 2022 Dec; 2(4):100190. PubMed ID: 36531579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new non-mydriatic digital camera for detection of diabetic retinopathy.
Massin P; Erginay A; Ben Mehidi A; Vicaut E; Quentel G; Victor Z; Marre M; Guillausseau PJ; Gaudric A
Diabet Med; 2003 Aug; 20(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 12873290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemorrhage and/or Microaneurysm Severity and Count in Ultrawide Field Images and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Photography.
Silva PS; El-Rami H; Barham R; Gupta A; Fleming A; van Hemert J; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):970-976. PubMed ID: 28336057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of pseudocolor ultrawide field imaging in comparison to wide field fundus fluorescein angiography in detecting retinal neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy.
Haridas S; Indurkhya S; Kumar S; Giridhar A; Sivaprasad S
Eye (Lond); 2022 Oct; 36(10):1940-1944. PubMed ID: 34584231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two ultra-widefield color-fundus imaging devices for visualization of retinal periphery and microvascular lesions in patients with early diabetic retinopathy.
Stino H; Riessland S; Sedova A; Datlinger F; Sacu S; Schmidt-Erfurth U; Pollreisz A
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17449. PubMed ID: 36261470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
