274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33529662)
1. Single versus double use of a suture-based closure device for transfemoral aortic valve implantation.
Reifart J; Liebetrau C; Weferling M; Dörr O; Renker M; Bhumimuang K; Liakopoulos O; Choi YH; Nef H; Hamm CW; Kim WK
Int J Cardiol; 2021 May; 331():183-188. PubMed ID: 33529662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative data of single versus double proglide vascular preclose technique after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the optimized catheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) japanese multicenter registry.
Kodama A; Yamamoto M; Shimura T; Kagase A; Koyama Y; Tada N; Takagi K; Araki M; Yamanaka F; Shirai S; Watanabe Y; Hayashida K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):E55-E62. PubMed ID: 27785881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of suture mediated femoral access site closure with the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide system on outcome in transfemoral aortic valve implantation.
Seeger J; Gonska B; Rodewald C; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 223():564-567. PubMed ID: 27561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Abdel-Wahab M; Hartung P; Dumpies O; Obradovic D; Wilde J; Majunke N; Boekstegers P; Müller R; Seyfarth M; Vorpahl M; Kiefer P; Noack T; Leontyev S; Sandri M; Rotta Detto Loria J; Kitamura M; Borger MA; Funkat AK; Hohenstein S; Desch S; Holzhey D; Thiele H;
Circulation; 2022 Jan; 145(3):170-183. PubMed ID: 34738828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation.
Barbash IM; Barbanti M; Webb J; Molina-Martin De Nicolas J; Abramowitz Y; Latib A; Nguyen C; Deuschl F; Segev A; Sideris K; Buccheri S; Simonato M; Rosa FD; Tamburino C; Jilaihawi H; Miyazaki T; Himbert D; Schofer N; Guetta V; Bleiziffer S; Tchetche D; Immè S; Makkar RR; Vahanian A; Treede H; Lange R; Colombo A; Dvir D
Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3370-9. PubMed ID: 26314688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular Complications Among Patients Undergoing Trans-femoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Prostar
Marcusohn E; Qasum M; Epstein D; Solomonica A; Orbach A; Musallam A; Kerner A; Feld Y
Angiology; 2022 Aug; 73(7):635-642. PubMed ID: 35147041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simple, effective and safe vascular access site closure with the double-ProGlide preclose technique in 162 patients receiving transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Griese DP; Reents W; Diegeler A; Kerber S; Babin-Ebell J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(5):E734-41. PubMed ID: 23765732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience.
Iacovelli F; Burattini O; Sturdà F; Branca M; Stabile E; Fimiani L; Salemme L; Cioppa A; Pucciarelli A; Cafaro A; Bortone AS; Contegiacomo G; Pignatelli A; Tesorio T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jun; 103(7):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38639140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manta versus Perclose ProGlide vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Initial experience from a large European center.
Dumpies O; Kitamura M; Majunke N; Hartung P; Haag A; Wilde J; Desch S; Sandri M; Crusius L; Noack T; Kiefer P; Leontyev S; Borger M; Thiele H; Holzhey D; Abdel-Wahab M
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Apr; 37():34-40. PubMed ID: 34257057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of MANTA vs ProGlide Vascular Closure Device and 30-Day Outcomes in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Eftychiou C; Eteocleous N; Mitsis A; Zittis I; Papadopoulos K; Petrou A; Adamou M; Kounnos C; Bekos C; Avraamides P
Tex Heart Inst J; 2022 Sep; 49(5):. PubMed ID: 36269884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Gmeiner JMD; Linnemann M; Steffen J; Scherer C; Orban M; Theiss H; Mehilli J; Sadoni S; Peterß S; Joskowiak D; Hagl C; Tsilimparis N; Curta A; Maurus S; Doldi PM; Löw K; Haum M; Roden D; Hausleiter J; Massberg S; Rizas K; Deseive S; Braun D
EuroIntervention; 2022 Nov; 18(10):812-819. PubMed ID: 35903846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The novel echo-guided ProGlide technique during percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Honda Y; Araki M; Yamawaki M; Tokuda T; Tsutumi M; Mori S; Sakamoto Y; Kobayashi N; Hirano K; Ito Y
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 31(2):216-222. PubMed ID: 29193337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-year outcomes with two suture-mediated closure devices to achieve access-site haemostasis following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Mehilli J; Jochheim D; Abdel-Wahab M; Rizas KD; Theiss H; Spenkuch N; Zadrozny M; Baquet M; El-Mawardy M; Sato T; Lange P; Kuppatt C; Greif M; Hausleiter J; Bauer A; Schwarz F; Pichlmaier M; Hagl C; Richardt G; Massberg S
EuroIntervention; 2016 Nov; 12(10):1298-1304. PubMed ID: 27866140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single versus double Perclose techniques for vascular closure during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Hollowed J; Akhondi A; Rabbani A; Oncel D; Suh W; Rafique A; Kwon M; Benharash P; Shemin R; Aksoy O
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jun; 99(7):2125-2130. PubMed ID: 35420254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity-matched comparison of large-bore access closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus Perclose: A real-world experience.
Medranda GA; Case BC; Zhang C; Rappaport H; Weissman G; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Ben-Dor I; Rogers T; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Sep; 98(3):580-585. PubMed ID: 34051039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center.
Bazarbashi N; Ahuja K; Gad MM; Sammour YM; Kaur M; Karrthik A; Saad AM; Khubber S; Dhaliwal K; Mick SL; Navia JL; Puri R; Reed GW; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):442-447. PubMed ID: 31713996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and Safety of ProGlide Versus Prostar XL Vascular Closure Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The RISPEVA Registry.
Berti S; Bedogni F; Giordano A; Petronio AS; Iadanza A; Bartorelli AL; Reimers B; Spaccarotella C; Trani C; Attisano T; Marella Cenname A; Sardella G; Bonmassari R; Medda M; Tomai F; Tarantini G; Navarese EP;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Nov; 9(21):e018042. PubMed ID: 33103545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MANTA versus ProGlide vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Biancari F; Romppanen H; Savontaus M; Siljander A; Mäkikallio T; Piira OP; Piuhola J; Vilkki V; Ylitalo A; Vasankari T; Airaksinen JKE; Niemelä M
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 263():29-31. PubMed ID: 29681408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes with plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sedhom R; Dang AT; Elwagdy A; Megaly M; Elgendy IY; Zahr F; Gafoor S; Mamas M; Elbadawi A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 101(4):817-827. PubMed ID: 36802100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of suture-based vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Barbanti M; Capranzano P; Ohno Y; Gulino S; Sgroi C; Immè S; Tamburino C; Cannata S; Patanè M; Di Stefano D; Todaro D; Di Simone E; Deste W; Gargiulo G; Capodanno D; Grasso C; Tamburino C
EuroIntervention; 2015 Oct; 11(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 26499222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
