These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33529783)

  • 41. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?
    ; Spindler KP; Huston LJ; Zajichek A; Reinke EK; Amendola A; Andrish JT; Brophy RH; Dunn WR; Flanigan DC; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Marx RG; Matava MJ; McCarty EC; Parker RD; Vidal AF; Wolcott ML; Wolf BR; Wright RW
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 31917613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Superior return to sports rate after patellar tendon autograft over patellar tendon allograft in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Keizer MNJ; Hoogeslag RAG; van Raay JJAM; Otten E; Brouwer RW
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Feb; 26(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 28624854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods.
    Taylor DC; DeBerardino TM; Nelson BJ; Duffey M; Tenuta J; Stoneman PD; Sturdivant RX; Mountcastle S
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 37(10):1946-57. PubMed ID: 19684298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Murray MM; Fleming BC; Badger GJ; ; Freiberger C; Henderson R; Barnett S; Kiapour A; Ecklund K; Proffen B; Sant N; Kramer DE; Micheli LJ; Yen YM
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 May; 48(6):1305-1315. PubMed ID: 32298131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft: technique and 2- to 5-year follow-up.
    Jiang D; Ao YF; Gong X; Wang YJ; Luo H; Chen LX; Wang HJ; Xie X; Zhang JY; Yu JK
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 May; 40(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 22472270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study.
    Lund B; Nielsen T; Faunø P; Christiansen SE; Lind M
    Arthroscopy; 2014 May; 30(5):593-8. PubMed ID: 24630956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [A comparison of effectiveness between ligament advanced reinforcement system and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].
    Li Y; Zhang W; Wu Y; Wang H; Kang L; Hu M; Chen G; Zhu B
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1045-50. PubMed ID: 23057343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Mitchell JJ; Chahla J; Dean CS; Cinque M; Matheny LM; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(8):1790-1798. PubMed ID: 28419808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft: evaluation of donor site strength and subjective results.
    Shelbourne KD; Beck MB; Gray T
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 25520302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Immediate post-operative pain in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery with bone patellar tendon bone graft versus hamstring graft.
    Gupta R; Kapoor D; Kapoor L; Malhotra A; Masih GD; Kapoor A; Joshi S
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 11(1):67. PubMed ID: 27277002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.
    Cristiani R; Engström B; Edman G; Forssblad M; Stålman A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jan; 27(1):137-145. PubMed ID: 30014185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via Independent Tunnel Drilling: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts.
    Ciccotti MC; Secrist E; Tjoumakaris F; Ciccotti MG; Freedman KB
    Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):1062-1071.e5. PubMed ID: 28359669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Double-layer versus single-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 3-year follow-up.
    Mei X; Zhang Z; Yang J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Dec; 136(12):1733-1739. PubMed ID: 27568219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Chen H; Liu H; Chen L
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2279-2291.e8. PubMed ID: 32387652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up.
    Holm I; Oiestad BE; Risberg MA; Aune AK
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 20097928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial.
    Ogura T; Omatsu H; Fukuda H; Asai S; Saito C; Takahashi T; Ichino Y; Omodani T; Sakai H; Yamaura I; Kawasaki Y; Tsuchiya A; Takahashi K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Nov; 141(11):1927-1934. PubMed ID: 33609182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft in a population 25 years old and younger.
    Barber FA; Cowden CH; Sanders EJ
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Apr; 30(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 24680308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: 19-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-up.
    Castoldi M; Magnussen RA; Gunst S; Batailler C; Neyret P; Lustig S; Servien E
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jun; 48(7):1665-1672. PubMed ID: 32368935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?
    Tomihara T; Hashimoto Y; Taniuchi M; Takigami J; Han C; Shimada N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 May; 25(5):1653-1661. PubMed ID: 28251262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Passive anterior tibia translation in anterior cruciate ligament-injured, anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and healthy knees: a systematic review.
    Keizer MNJ; Otten E
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Aug; 103(2):121-130. PubMed ID: 30328030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.