These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33530059)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
    Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Apr; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.
    Burnett MG; Stein SC; Bartels RH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jul; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 20594016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
    van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted.
    Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 17176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.
    Patil CG; Sarmiento JM; Ugiliweneza B; Mukherjee D; Nuño M; Liu JC; Walia S; Lad SP; Boakye M
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1484-92. PubMed ID: 24291409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Aas E; Lydersen S; Andresen H; Rønning R; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 25608246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients.
    Udeh BL; Costandi S; Dalton JE; Ghosh R; Yousef H; Mekhail N
    Pain Pract; 2015 Feb; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 24393198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).
    Cairns K; Deer T; Sayed D; van Noort K; Liang K
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. PubMed ID: 31808529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Simple Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kayalar AE; Onen MR; Gerilmez A; Naderi S
    Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(5):643-650. PubMed ID: 31353433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chiu JC
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():265-75. PubMed ID: 17029185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Park SM; Park J; Jang HS; Heo YW; Han H; Kim HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 31542473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.
    Tapp SJ; Martin BI; Tosteson TD; Lurie JD; Weinstein MC; Deyo RA; Mirza SK; Tosteson ANA
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):584-592. PubMed ID: 28847740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of X-stop Interspinous Distractor Device Versus Laminectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ekhator C; Griepp D; Urbi A; Fiani B
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37535. PubMed ID: 37077368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.