These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33530377)

  • 1. Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.
    Pesenti M; Antonietti A; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons.
    Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
    de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.
    Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: A systematic review.
    Ma T; Zhang Y; Choi SD; Xiong S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104100. PubMed ID: 37490791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of an active and passive industrial back exoskeleton on functional performance.
    Govaerts R; De Bock S; Provyn S; Vanderborght B; Roelands B; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
    Ergonomics; 2024 May; 67(5):597-618. PubMed ID: 37480301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons.
    Li-Baboud YS; Virts A; Bostelman R; Yoon S; Rahman A; Rhode L; Ahmed N; Shah M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry.
    Okunola A; Afolabi A; Akanmu A; Jebelli H; Simikins S
    J Safety Res; 2024 Sep; 90():402-415. PubMed ID: 39251296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.
    Kermavnar T; de Vries AW; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):685-711. PubMed ID: 33369518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits.
    Ali A; Fontanari V; Schmoelz W; Agrawal SK
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():765257. PubMed ID: 34805118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Proud JK; Lai DTH; Mudie KL; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Garofolini A; Begg RK
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):527-554. PubMed ID: 33203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social Processes: What Determines Industrial Workers' Intention to Use Exoskeletons?
    Elprama SA; Vannieuwenhuyze JTA; De Bock S; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K; Meeusen R; Jacobs A
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):337-350. PubMed ID: 31971838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IMU-based human activity recognition and payload classification for low-back exoskeletons.
    Pesenti M; Invernizzi G; Mazzella J; Bocciolone M; Pedrocchi A; Gandolla M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1184. PubMed ID: 36681711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality, productivity, and economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use: A systematic review.
    Fournier DE; Yung M; Somasundram KG; Du BB; Rezvani S; Yazdani A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287742. PubMed ID: 37368889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
    Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.
    Zheng L; Lowe B; Hawke AL; Wu JZ
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2021; 49(4):1-13. PubMed ID: 35695600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematic and kinetic functional requirements for industrial exoskeletons for lifting tasks and overhead lifting.
    Huysamen K; Power V; O'Sullivan L
    Ergonomics; 2020 Jul; 63(7):818-830. PubMed ID: 32320343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.