154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33530956)
1. The acceptability to women of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section and of randomised trials evaluating those techniques: a qualitative study.
Romano G; Mitchell E; Plachcinski R; Wakefield N; Walker K; Ayers S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):103. PubMed ID: 33530956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of a RCT of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: the MIDAS scoping study.
Walker KF; Mitchell EJ; Ayers S; Jones NW; Ogollah R; Wakefield N; Dorling J; Pallotti P; Pillai A; Tempest N; Plachcinski R; Bradshaw L; Knight M; Thornton JG
Health Technol Assess; 2023 Mar; 27(6):1-87. PubMed ID: 37022927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised trial exploring approaches to managing impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: a qualitative study.
Romano G; Ayers S; Constantinou G; Mitchell EJ; Plachcinski R; Wakefield N; Walker KF
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):216. PubMed ID: 36991399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.
Waterfall H; Grivell RM; Dodd JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD004944. PubMed ID: 26827159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study.
Kenyon SL; Johns N; Duggal S; Hewston R; Gale N
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Nov; 16(1):348. PubMed ID: 27829395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
Lenz F; Kimmich N; Zimmermann R; Kreft M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 30917799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Downe S; Finlayson K; Tunçalp Ö; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 6(6):CD012392. PubMed ID: 31194903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents.
Hanley SJ; Walker KF; Wakefield N; Plachcinski R; Pallotti P; Tempest N; Pillai A; Thornton J; Jones N; Mitchell EJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():88-92. PubMed ID: 35168126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.
Walker KF; Kibuka M; Thornton JG; Jones NW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 11(11):CD008070. PubMed ID: 30411804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reverse breech extraction versus the standard approach of pushing the impacted fetal head up through the vagina in caesarean section for obstructed labour: A randomised controlled trial.
Nooh AM; Abdeldayem HM; Ben-Affan O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):459-463. PubMed ID: 28141942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.
Houghton G; Kingdon C; Dower M; Shakur-Still H; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2018 Dec; 125(13):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 29911309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.
Horey D; Kealy M; Davey MA; Small R; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD010041. PubMed ID: 23897547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study.
Weckesser A; Farmer N; Dam R; Wilson A; Morton VH; Morris RK
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jul; 19(1):245. PubMed ID: 31307417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'What about the mother?' Women's and caregivers' perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates.
Litorp H; Mgaya A; Kidanto HL; Johnsdotter S; Essén B
Midwifery; 2015 Jul; 31(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 25886967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.
Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM; Cuthbert A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD006066. PubMed ID: 28157275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.
Emmett CL; Shaw AR; Montgomery AA; Murphy DJ;
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1438-45. PubMed ID: 17081180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.
Say R; Thomson R; Robson S; Exley C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 23324533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.
Chen I; Opiyo N; Tavender E; Mortazhejri S; Rader T; Petkovic J; Yogasingam S; Taljaard M; Agarwal S; Laopaiboon M; Wasiak J; Khunpradit S; Lumbiganon P; Gruen RL; Betran AP
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 9(9):CD005528. PubMed ID: 30264405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
