195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33532336)
1. Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients.
Li Y; Chen J; Zhu Z; Zeng H; Zeng F; Chen Z; Yang Z; Cui Y; Chen H; Li Y
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):483-493. PubMed ID: 33532336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediatesize renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Zewu Z; Cui Y; Feng Z; Yang L; Chen H
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 30620157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Meng C; Peng L; Li J; Li Y; Li J; Wu J
Front Surg; 2021; 8():691170. PubMed ID: 34722620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-use flexible ureteroscope provides an alternative treatment for upper urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang F; Xu J; Liang H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Sep; 102(36):e34829. PubMed ID: 37682159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of stone load on the outcome of same-session flexible ureteroscopy for bilateral upper urinary tract stones: a multicenter retrospective study.
Tu WC; Zhang XL; Wang J; Huang BX; Zhang DG; Wang DW
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1163371. PubMed ID: 38034526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma YC; Jian ZY; Jin X; Li H; Wang KJ
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Apr; 10(4):1627-1636. PubMed ID: 33968651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-Use vs. Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope to Treat Upper Urinary Calculi: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.
Huang F; Zhang X; Cui Y; Zhu Z; Li Y; Chen J; Zeng F; Li Y; Chen Z; Chen H
Front Surg; 2021; 8():778157. PubMed ID: 35083269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.
Singh AG; Chhabra JS; Sabnis R; Ganpule A; Jairath A; Shah D; Desai M
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):319-324. PubMed ID: 27306685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi.
Wang F; Yang Y; Chen H; Huang H; Huang W; Weng Z; Xie H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 29797215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Rindorf DK; Tailly T; Kamphuis GM; Larsen S; Somani BK; Traxer O; Koo K
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():64-72. PubMed ID: 35128483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Maia RS; de Almeida Artifon EL; Otoch JP; Da Cruz JAS
Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):37. PubMed ID: 38413490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
