These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33532984)

  • 1. "What you see may not be what you get": Reverse contingency and perceived loss aversion in pigeons.
    Sturgill J; Bergeron C; Ransdell T; Colvin T; Joshi G; Zentall TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 33532984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pigeons are attracted to a perceived gain without an actual gain.
    Clayton WD; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2021 May; 24(3):605-611. PubMed ID: 33389216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.
    Beran MJ; James BT; Whitham W; Parrish AE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):347-358. PubMed ID: 27598059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?
    Green L; Myerson J; Holt DD; Slevin JR; Estle SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 15113132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive flexibility and dual processing in pigeons: Temporal and contextual control of midsession reversal.
    MacDonald H; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 29469583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Berry JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):957-963. PubMed ID: 27743217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The paradoxical performance by different species on the ephemeral reward task.
    Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2021 Mar; 49(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32583140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midsession reversal learning: Pigeons learn what stimulus to avoid.
    Zentall TR; Halloran M; Peng D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 32212774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making under risk: framing effects in pigeon risk preferences.
    Clayton WD; Brantley SM; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Oct; 25(5):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 35296920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22229590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.
    Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):997-1004. PubMed ID: 23430792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.
    Addessi E; Bellagamba F; Delfino A; De Petrillo F; Focaroli V; Macchitella L; Maggiorelli V; Pace B; Pecora G; Rossi S; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Paglieri F
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 24387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):431-445. PubMed ID: 31414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single units in the pigeon brain integrate reward amount and time-to-reward in an impulsive choice task.
    Kalenscher T; Windmann S; Diekamp B; Rose J; Güntürkün O; Colombo M
    Curr Biol; 2005 Apr; 15(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 15823531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: 'jackpot' signals promote maladaptive risky choice.
    Smith AP; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6625. PubMed ID: 28747679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Delay aversion but preference for large and rare rewards in two choice tasks: implications for the measurement of self-control parameters.
    Adriani W; Laviola G
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():52. PubMed ID: 16796752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing "self-control": The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement.
    Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2020 Mar; 48(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 32026400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.