167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33534407)
1. Limited Utility of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Testing in HIV Clinic Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Dionne-Odom J; Van Der Pol B; Boutwell A; Biligowda N; Schmid DG; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 2021 Sep; 48(9):675-679. PubMed ID: 33534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance Characteristics of the Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm in a Population With a Moderately High Prevalence of Syphilis.
Rourk AR; Nolte FS; Litwin CM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Nov; 146(5):572-577. PubMed ID: 27773873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent clinic-based evaluation of dual POCTs for screening for HIV and syphilis in men who have sex with men in Italy, Malta, Peru, and the United Kingdom.
Sherriff N; Mirandola M; Silva R; Cordioli M; Sawyer A; Gios L; Zorzi A; Huber J; Vera J; Richardson D; Hassan-Ibrahim M; Wlazly D; Padovese V; Barbara C; Darmanin A; Schembri A; Caceres C; Vargas S; Blondeel K; Kiarie J; Kurbonov F; Peeling RW; Thwin SS; Toskin I;
BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Feb; 24(Suppl 1):192. PubMed ID: 38418941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. British Columbia's Experience after Implementation of the Treponema pallidum Reverse Algorithm and PCR Detection, 2015 to 2020.
Morshed M; Lee MK; Laley J; Cook D; Mak A; Chahil N; Ryan V; Montgomery C; Makaroff S; Malleson S; Arnold B; Grennan T; Wong J; Krajden M
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Jun; 10(3):e0068622. PubMed ID: 35658597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid Syphilis Testing for Men Who Have Sex With Men in Outreach Settings: Evaluation of Test Performance and Impact on Time to Treatment.
Obafemi OA; Wendel KA; Anderson TS; Scott TE; Rowan SE; Travanty EA; Rietmeijer CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2019 Mar; 46(3):191-195. PubMed ID: 30363029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of age, gender, and pregnancy on syphilis screening using the Captia Syphilis-G assay.
Henrich TJ; Yawetz S
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 22082723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The laboratory impact of changing syphilis screening from the rapid-plasma reagin to a treponemal enzyme immunoassay: a case-study from the Greater Toronto Area.
Mishra S; Boily MC; Ng V; Gold WL; Okura T; Shaw M; Mazzulli T; Fisman DN
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Mar; 38(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 20706176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study.
Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z
Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between DiaSorin Liaison Treponema pallidum antibody indices and confirmatory assay results in the reverse syphilis testing algorithm.
Prince HE; Marlowe EM; Schwab DA
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 May; 100(1):115303. PubMed ID: 33503569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.
Binnicker MJ; Jespersen DJ; Rollins LO
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 49(4):1313-7. PubMed ID: 21346050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an IgM/IgG sensitive enzyme immunoassay and the utility of index values for the screening of syphilis infection in a high-risk population.
Wong EH; Klausner JD; Caguin-Grygiel G; Madayag C; Barber KO; Qiu JS; Liska S; Pandori MW
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 21233789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
Zarakolu P
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care rapid combination syphilis-HIV-HCV tests.
Hess KL; Fisher DG; Reynolds GL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112190. PubMed ID: 25375138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-country comparative study of two treponemal tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM): Chemo-luminescent assay vs Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay.
Gios L; Mirandola M; Cordioli M; Zorzi A; Sherriff N; Vera J; Wlazly D; Hassan-Ibrahim MO; Padovese V; Anabel Darmanin ; Peeling RW; Unemo M; Blondeel K; Toskin I
BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 24(Suppl 1):313. PubMed ID: 38486194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay.
Arbefeville S; Lynch M; Ferrieri P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jul; 152(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31139835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
