These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33534837)

  • 1. Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts.
    Vial AC; Bosak J; Flood PC; Dovidio JF
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0244393. PubMed ID: 33534837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Third-party prejudice accommodation increases gender discrimination.
    Vial AC; Brescoll VL; Dovidio JF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Jul; 117(1):73-98. PubMed ID: 30335417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prototypes and same-gender bias in perceptions of hiring discrimination.
    Carlsson R; Sinclair S
    J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(3):285-297. PubMed ID: 28614000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination.
    Agerström J; Rooth DO
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):790-805. PubMed ID: 21280934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context in selection of men and women in hiring decisions: gender composition of the applicant pool.
    van Ommeren J; de Vries RE; Russo G; van Ommeren M
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 15941109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review.
    Isaac C; Lee B; Carnes M
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1440-6. PubMed ID: 19881440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-based hiring discrimination as a function of equity norms and self-perceived objectivity.
    Lindner NM; Graser A; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84752. PubMed ID: 24465429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.
    Jawahar IM; Mattsson J
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):563-73. PubMed ID: 15910150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions.
    Cable DM; Judge TA
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Aug; 82(4):546-61. PubMed ID: 9378683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of context on the silver ceiling: a role congruity perspective on prejudiced responses.
    Diekman AB; Hirnisey L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1353-66. PubMed ID: 17933733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms.
    Hangartner D; Kopp D; Siegenthaler M
    Nature; 2021 Jan; 589(7843):572-576. PubMed ID: 33473211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doxing, political affiliation, and type of information: Effects on suspicion, perceived similarity, and hiring-related judgments.
    Roth PL; Bobko P; Shan GJ; Roth RW; Ferrise E; Thatcher JB
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 May; 109(5):730-754. PubMed ID: 38127578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments.
    Galos DR; Coppock A
    Sci Adv; 2023 May; 9(18):eade7979. PubMed ID: 37146136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What predicts employer discrimination? The role of implicit and explicit racial attitudes.
    Silva F
    Soc Sci Res; 2022 Nov; 108():102775. PubMed ID: 36334921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Psychological barriers to professional inclusion of people with mental disabilities].
    Laberon S
    Encephale; 2014 Jun; 40 Suppl 2():S103-14. PubMed ID: 24948481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender, race-ethnicity and postdoctoral hiring in STEMM fields.
    Shauman KA; Huynh J
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 Jul; 113():102854. PubMed ID: 37230711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters.
    Fan Y; Shepherd LJ; Slavich E; Waters D; Stone M; Abel R; Johnston EL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0209749. PubMed ID: 30759093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination.
    Uhlmann E; Cohen GL
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jun; 16(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 15943674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is disability more discriminatory in hiring than ethnicity, address or gender? Evidence from a multi-criteria correspondence experiment.
    L'Horty Y; Mahmoudi N; Petit P; Wolff FC
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jun; 303():114990. PubMed ID: 35576767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview.
    Pingitore R; Dugoni BL; Tindale RS; Spring B
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Dec; 79(6):909-17. PubMed ID: 7852208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.