202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33536091)
21. Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation.
Burghard A; Lenarz T; Kral A; Paasche G
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():21-7. PubMed ID: 24566091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Forces and trauma associated with minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation.
Rohani P; Pile J; Kahrs LA; Balachandran R; Blachon GS; Simaan N; Labadie RF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 150(4):638-45. PubMed ID: 24468898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Scalar localization by computed tomography of cochlear implant electrode carriers designed for deep insertion.
Helbig S; Mack M; Schell B; Bratzke H; Stöver T; Helbig M
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):745-50. PubMed ID: 22664904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variability of an ideal insertion vector for cochlear implantation.
Breinbauer HA; Praetorius M
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 25634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Cochlear implants in isolated temporal bones: evaluation of electrode position with 64-slice computed tomography].
Wagner JH; Rademacher G; Ernst A; Todt I
HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 19455290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Atlas-based segmentation of cochlear microstructures in cone beam CT.
Powell KA; Wiet GJ; Hittle B; Oswald GI; Keith JP; Stredney D; Andersen SAW
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Mar; 16(3):363-373. PubMed ID: 33580852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preliminary Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Insertion Techniques.
Labadie RF; Noble JH
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):922-928. PubMed ID: 29995013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Stidham K; Roberson JB
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 16158535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Applied anatomy of scala tympani inlet related to cochlear implantation].
Zou T; Guo M; Zhang H; Shu F; Xie N
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):904-7. PubMed ID: 22699082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anatomy of the Round Window Region With Relation to Selection of Entry Site Into the Scala Tympani.
Pringle MB; Konieczny KM
Laryngoscope; 2021 Feb; 131(2):E598-E604. PubMed ID: 32415784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of cone beam imaging to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones.
Saeed SR; Selvadurai D; Beale T; Murray B; Boyd P; Biggs N; Gibson P; Risi F
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S14-5. PubMed ID: 24533756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical approach to the facial recess influences the acceptable trajectory of cochlear implantation electrodes.
Copson B; Wijewickrema S; Ma X; Zhou Y; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jan; 279(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 33547488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S8-S10. PubMed ID: 24869453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Variability of the mental representation of the cochlear anatomy during cochlear implantation.
Torres R; Kazmitcheff G; Bernardeschi D; De Seta D; Bensimon JL; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Nguyen Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 273(8):2009-18. PubMed ID: 26324880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Morphometric Analysis and Linear Measurements of the Scala Tympani and Implications in Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
Fujiwara RJT; Ishiyama G; Lopez IA; Ishiyama A
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):e343-e349. PubMed ID: 36893208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani.
Connor SE; Holland NJ; Agger A; Leong AC; Varghese RA; Jiang D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):932-7. PubMed ID: 22667826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]