178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33536126)
1. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic disease assessment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
Harrison RF; Cantor SB; Sun CC; Villanueva M; Westin SN; Fleming ND; Toumazis I; Sood AK; Lu KH; Meyer LA
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Apr; 161(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 33536126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus primary cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer during the initial treatment phase.
Tran AQ; Erim DO; Sullivan SA; Cole AL; Barber EL; Kim KH; Gehrig PA; Wheeler SB
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 148(2):329-335. PubMed ID: 29273308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.
Cole AL; Barber EL; Gogate A; Tran AQ; Wheeler SB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jul; 28(6):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29683880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy as diagnostic tool before primary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer.
van de Vrie R; van Meurs HS; Rutten MJ; Naaktgeboren CA; Opmeer BC; Gaarenstroom KN; van Gorp T; Ter Brugge HG; Hofhuis W; Schreuder HWR; Arts HJG; Zusterzeel PLM; Pijnenborg JMA; van Haaften M; Engelen MJA; Boss EA; Vos MC; Gerestein KG; Schutter EMJ; Kenter GG; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BW; Buist MR
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 146(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 28645428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-utility comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in patients 65 years old or older.
Rowland MR; Lesnock JL; Farris C; Kelley JL; Krivak TC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):763.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25644442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer.
Nica A; Lee JYJ; Hong NL; May T
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):206-213. PubMed ID: 33032821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Effectiveness of Interval Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Stage III Ovarian Cancer on the Basis of a Randomized Phase III Trial.
Koole SN; van Lieshout C; van Driel WJ; van Schagen E; Sikorska K; Kieffer JM; Schagen van Leeuwen JH; Schreuder HWR; Hermans RH; de Hingh IH; van der Velden J; Arts HJ; Massuger LFAG; Aalbers AG; Verwaal VJ; Van de Vijver KK; Aaronson NK; van Tinteren H; Sonke GS; van Harten WH; Retèl VP
J Clin Oncol; 2019 Aug; 37(23):2041-2050. PubMed ID: 31251694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.
Kobal B; Noventa M; Cvjeticanin B; Barbic M; Meglic L; Herzog M; Bordi G; Vitagliano A; Saccardi C; Skof E
Radiol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):307-319. PubMed ID: 30210049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at interval debulking of epithelial ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lim SL; Havrilesky LJ; Habib AS; Secord AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):376-380. PubMed ID: 30718126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study.
Gueli Alletti S; Bottoni C; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Cosentino F; Ercoli A; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):503.e1-503.e6. PubMed ID: 26529370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a phase II prospective multicenter non-randomized trial (the CILOVE study).
Pomel C; Akladios C; Lambaudie E; Rouzier R; Ferron G; Lecuru F; Classe JM; Fourchotte V; Paillocher N; Wattiez A; Montoriol PF; Thivat E; Beguinot M; Canis M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Dec; 31(12):1572-1578. PubMed ID: 34670829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Main C; Bojke L; Griffin S; Norman G; Barbieri M; Mather L; Stark D; Palmer S; Riemsma R
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(9):1-132. iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic Evaluation of Talimogene Laherparepvec Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy vs Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma.
Almutairi AR; Alkhatib NS; Oh M; Curiel-Lewandrowski C; Babiker HM; Cranmer LD; McBride A; Abraham I
JAMA Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 155(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30477000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load (SCORPION trial): Final analysis of peri-operative outcome.
Fagotti A; Ferrandina G; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Margariti PA; Gueli Alletti S; Cosentino F; Tortorella L; Scambia G
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():22-33. PubMed ID: 26998845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
Mortensen MB
Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Murray A; Lourenco T; de Verteuil R; Hernandez R; Fraser C; McKinley A; Krukowski Z; Vale L; Grant A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(45):1-141, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17083853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
