These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33536947)

  • 1. A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation.
    Efkemann SA; Scholten M; Bottlender R; Juckel G; Gather J
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():573240. PubMed ID: 33536947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the staff attitude to coercion scale: an exploratory factor analysis.
    Venturini P; Bassi G; Salcuni S; Kotzalidis GD; Telesforo CL; Salustri E; Trevisi M; Roselli V; Tarsitani L; Infante V; Niolu C; Polselli G; Boldrini T
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1172803. PubMed ID: 37293405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.
    Lickiewicz J; Husum TL; Ruud T; Siqveland J; Musiał Z; Makara-Studzińska M
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():745215. PubMed ID: 34867536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) - Polish adaptation.
    Kiejna A; Jakubczyk MH; Gondek TM; Rajba B
    Psychiatr Pol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 32447360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience of violence and attitudes of staff members towards coercion in psychiatric settings: observational study.
    Wullschleger A; Chatton A; Kuenzi N; Baeriswyl R; Kaiser S; Bartolomei J
    BJPsych Open; 2024 Apr; 10(3):e80. PubMed ID: 38616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic literature review of the use of Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).
    Husum TL; Siqveland J; Ruud T; Lickiewicz J
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1063276. PubMed ID: 36824675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of mental health professionals' attitudes and personality traits on decision-making around coercion: Results from an experimental quantitative survey using case vignettes.
    Efkemann SA; Scholten M; Bottlender R; Juckel G; Gather J
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2022 Aug; 146(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 35322402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS): reliability, validity and feasibility.
    Husum TL; Finset A; Ruud T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 18817973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Implicit and Explicit Staff Attitudes in the Use of Coercive Measures in Psychiatry.
    Vandamme A; Wullschleger A; Garbe A; Cole C; Heinz A; Bermpohl F; Mielau J; Mahler L; Montag C
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():699446. PubMed ID: 34220595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.
    Husum TL; Ruud T; Lickiewicz J; Siqveland J
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():744661. PubMed ID: 35573326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.
    Fukasawa M; Miyake M; Kikkawa T; Sueyasu T
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1026676. PubMed ID: 36325534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India.
    Raveesh BN; Pathare S; Noorthoorn EO; Gowda GS; Lepping P; Bunders-Aelen JG
    Indian J Psychiatry; 2016 Dec; 58(Suppl 2):S221-S229. PubMed ID: 28216773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards.
    Husum TL; Bjørngaard JH; Finset A; Ruud T
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 20596695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cologne Questionnaire on Attitudes Towards Coercive Measures (KEZ)].
    Baar I; Schmitz-Buhl M; Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E
    Psychiatr Prax; 2022 Sep; 49(6):322-328. PubMed ID: 34433213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informal coercion in acute inpatient setting--knowledge and attitudes held by mental health professionals.
    Jaeger M; Ketteler D; Rabenschlag F; Theodoridou A
    Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(3):1007-11. PubMed ID: 25249438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of coercion in mental healthcare services in Nigeria: Service providers' perspective.
    Aluh DO; Ayilara O; Onu JU; Pedrosa B; Silva M; Grigaitė U; Santos-Dias M; Cardoso G; Caldas-de-Almeida JM
    J Ment Health; 2024 Feb; 33(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 36850036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Weil R; Nagel M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Feb; 260():478-485. PubMed ID: 29287276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinician attitude and perspective on the use of coercive measures in clinical practice from tertiary care mental health establishment - A cross-sectional study.
    Gowda GS; Lepping P; Ray S; Noorthoorn E; Nanjegowda RB; Kumar CN; Math SB
    Indian J Psychiatry; 2019; 61(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 30992609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental health professionals' feelings and attitudes towards coercion.
    Morandi S; Silva B; Mendez Rubio M; Bonsack C; Golay P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 74():101665. PubMed ID: 33401095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway.
    Joa I; Hustoft K; Anda LG; Brønnick K; Nielssen O; Johannessen JO; Langeveld JH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 29157507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.