These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33536947)
21. Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway. Joa I; Hustoft K; Anda LG; Brønnick K; Nielssen O; Johannessen JO; Langeveld JH Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 29157507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Professional Boundaries of Nursing Staff in Secure Mental Health Services: Impact of Interpersonal Style and Attitude Toward Coercion. Lambert K; Chu S; Turner P J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2019 Feb; 57(2):16-24. PubMed ID: 30272813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Between authoritarian and dialogical approaches: Attitudes and opinions on coercion among professionals in mental health and addiction care in Norway. Aasland OG; Husum TL; Førde R; Pedersen R Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():106-112. PubMed ID: 29548497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Approval ratings of inpatient coercive interventions in a national sample of mental health service users and staff in England. Whittington R; Bowers L; Nolan P; Simpson A; Neil L Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jun; 60(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 19487349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cross-sectional study on nurses' attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress. Bregar B; Skela-Savič B; Kores Plesničar B BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 29866142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients]. Jaussent S; Labarère J; Boyer JP; François P Encephale; 2004; 30(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 15627048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy : A pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument]. Adorjan K; Steinert T; Flammer E; Deister A; Koller M; Zinkler M; Herpertz SC; Häfner S; Hohl-Radke F; Beine KH; Falkai P; Gerlinger G; Pogarell O; Pollmächer T Nervenarzt; 2017 Jul; 88(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 27981375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Antipsychotic treatment of psychotic disorders in forensic psychiatry: Patients' perception of coercion and its predictors. Horvath J; Steinert T; Jaeger S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():113-121. PubMed ID: 29548498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subjective experience of coercion in psychiatric care: a study comparing the attitudes of patients and healthy volunteers towards coercive methods and their justification. Mielau J; Altunbay J; Gallinat J; Heinz A; Bermpohl F; Lehmann A; Montag C Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 266(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25900468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Admission Experience Survey Italian Version (I-AES): A factor analytic study on a sample of 156 acute psychiatric in-patients. Mandarelli G; Parmigiani G; Trobia F; Tessari G; Roma P; Biondi M; Ferracuti S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 62():111-116. PubMed ID: 30616845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Involuntary admission and treatment experiences of persons with schizophrenia: Implication for the Mental Health Care Bill 2016. Gowda GS; Kondapuram N; Kumar CN; Math SB Asian J Psychiatr; 2017 Oct; 29():3-7. PubMed ID: 29061422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interpretations of legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission: a qualitative analysis. Feiring E; Ugstad KN BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Oct; 14():500. PubMed ID: 25344295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Turkish version of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration: a preliminary study. Yildirim A; Akinci F; Ates M; Ross T; Issever H; Isci E; Selimen D Contemp Nurse; 2006 Oct; 23(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17083318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coercion, involuntary treatment and quality of mental health care: is there any link? Salize HJ; Dressing H Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2005 Sep; 18(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 16639122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A cross-sectional study of experienced coercion in adolescent mental health inpatients. Nyttingnes O; Ruud T; Norvoll R; Rugkåsa J; Hanssen-Bauer K BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 29848338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F]. Corbière M; Lesage A; Lauzon S; Ricard N; Reinharz D Encephale; 2003; 29(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 14567162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nurses' perspectives on human rights when coercion is used in psychiatry: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence. Pariseau-Legault P; Vallée-Ouimet S; Goulet MH; Jacob JD Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):318. PubMed ID: 31815660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]