These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3353711)

  • 1. Biowarfare lab faces mounting opposition.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4849):135. PubMed ID: 3353711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US biological weapons: protests over US Army lab.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):377. PubMed ID: 11653654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court blocks Army testing laboratory.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1985 Jun; 127(23):359. PubMed ID: 11653638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New army biowarfare lab raises concerns.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1984 Dec; 226(4679):1176-8. PubMed ID: 6505684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rifkin vs. Defense Department.
    Sci News; 1984 Dec 22-29; 126(25-26):397. PubMed ID: 11653595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological warfare in the twentieth century: lessons from the past, challenges for the future.
    Mobley JA
    Mil Med; 1995 Nov; 160(11):547-53. PubMed ID: 8538887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Army sprayed bacteria on unsuspecting travelers.
    Ringle K
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():B1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The front lines of biowarfare: today's anti-terrorism effort casts early test subjects in new light.
    Snyder D
    Washington Post; 2003 May; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 12812180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balancing pluralism and the common good: a look at open-air experiments of biowarfare agents.
    Trotter G
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 14577423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US looks to biological weapons.
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5868):615-6. PubMed ID: 7088146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No NIH ban.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5870):111. PubMed ID: 7088166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicine in defense against biological warfare.
    Huxsoll DL; Parrott CD; Patrick WC
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):677-9. PubMed ID: 2746818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stemming the disease of war.
    Segall J
    New Sci; 1982 Sep; 95(1325):926. PubMed ID: 11655499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research on biological warfare is challenged.
    Cushman JH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological weapons--banned, but gone forever?
    Humphrey JH
    Med War; 1987; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3470592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. troops were subjected to a wider toxic testing.
    Shanker T
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Japan taken to court over germ-warfare allegations.
    Watts J
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9103):657. PubMed ID: 9500345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Germ wars.
    Hendricks M
    Sci News; 1988 Dec; 134(25):392-5. PubMed ID: 11650828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological defense research: charting a safer course.
    Jacobson JA; Rosenberg BH
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):675-6. PubMed ID: 2664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene warfare--unless we keep our guard up.
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9036):1183. PubMed ID: 8898028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.