128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33538076)
1. Does the order of intraocular pressure measurement affect tonometry results?
Pe'er O; Chiu E; Arad D; Lelescu C; Ross M; Ofri R
Vet Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():146-153. PubMed ID: 33538076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraocular pressures estimated by rebound and applanation tonometry in dogs with lens instability: 66 cases (2012-2018).
Schlesener BN; Leonard BC; Miller PE; Kass PH; Hollingsworth SR; Cooper AE; Maggs DJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Nov; 259(9):1025-1031. PubMed ID: 34647480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses.
Knollinger AM; La Croix NC; Barrett PM; Miller PE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Jul; 227(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 16047660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy unanesthetized inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps).
Schuster EJ; Strueve J; Fehr MJ; Mathes KA
Am J Vet Res; 2015 Jun; 76(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 26000596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraocular pressure reference intervals in eyes of clinically normal miniature donkeys (Equus africanus asinus).
Hibbs CD; Barrett PM; Dees DD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 22(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29517162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro and in vivo comparison of applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in dogs.
Nagata N; Yuki M; Hasegawa T
J Vet Med Sci; 2011 Dec; 73(12):1585-9. PubMed ID: 21804316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma.
Pronin S; Brown L; Megaw R; Tatham AJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(10):1030-1036. PubMed ID: 28859192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING REBOUND AND APPLANATION TONOMETRY IN LOGGERHEAD (
Lamagna B; Affuso A; Micieli F; Mennonna G; Meomartino L; Valle GD; Ciampa M; Treglia G; Hochscheid S
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2021 Jun; 52(2):604-609. PubMed ID: 34130403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.
Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of variability in the results of applanation tonometry.
Motolko MA; Feldman F; Hyde M; Hudy D
Can J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jun; 17(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 7116219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
