188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33539357)
21. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
Xu H; Craig BA
Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard.
Albert PS; Dodd LE
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 15180668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modeling conditional dependence among multiple diagnostic tests.
Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Zar HJ; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4843-4859. PubMed ID: 28875512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sensitive diagnostic tools and targeted drug administration strategies are needed to eliminate schistosomiasis.
Amoah AS; Hoekstra PT; Casacuberta-Partal M; Coffeng LE; Corstjens PLAM; Greco B; van Lieshout L; Lim MD; Markwalter CF; Odiere MR; Reinhard-Rupp J; Roestenberg M; Stothard R; Tchuem Tchuenté LA; de Vlas SJ; van Dam GJ
Lancet Infect Dis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):e165-e172. PubMed ID: 32595046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reevaluating the true diagnostic accuracy of dipstick tests to diagnose urinary tract infection using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Bafna P; Deepanjali S; Mandal J; Balamurugan N; Swaminathan RP; Kadhiravan T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244870. PubMed ID: 33382863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Formann AK; Böhning D
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A statistical method was used for the meta-analysis of tests for latent TB in the absence of a gold standard, combining random-effect and latent-class methods to estimate test accuracy.
Sadatsafavi M; Shahidi N; Marra F; FitzGerald MJ; Elwood KR; Guo N; Marra CA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 19692208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy.
Yang I; Becker MP
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 9290225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Latent class models for Echinococcus multilocularis diagnosis in foxes in Switzerland in the absence of a gold standard.
Otero-Abad B; Armua-Fernandez MT; Deplazes P; Torgerson PR; Hartnack S
Parasit Vectors; 2017 Dec; 10(1):612. PubMed ID: 29258612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
Valenstein PN
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How to Determine the Accuracy of an Alternative Diagnostic Test when It Is Actually Better than the Reference Tests: A Re-Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Scrub Typhus Using Bayesian LCMs.
Lim C; Paris DH; Blacksell SD; Laongnualpanich A; Kantipong P; Chierakul W; Wuthiekanun V; Day NP; Cooper BS; Limmathurotsakul D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0114930. PubMed ID: 26024375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of parasitological and immunological tests for the screening of human schistosomiasis in immigrants and refugees from African countries: An approach with Latent Class Analysis.
Beltrame A; Guerriero M; Angheben A; Gobbi F; Requena-Mendez A; Zammarchi L; Formenti F; Perandin F; Buonfrate D; Bisoffi Z
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2017 Jun; 11(6):e0005593. PubMed ID: 28582412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using extended Rasch models to assess validity of diagnostic tests in the presence of a reference standard.
Viallon V; Ecosse E; Mesbah M; Pouchot J; Coste J
J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):376-93. PubMed ID: 23270981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
