189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33539357)
41. Latent class models for medical diagnostic tests in multicenter trials.
Mori J; Kano Y; Yoshizaki M; Fukinbara S
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5091-105. PubMed ID: 24038422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Intestinal schistosomiasis: Can a urine sample decide the infection?
Diab RG; Tolba MM; Ghazala RA; Abu-Sheasha GA; Webster BL; Mady RF
Parasitol Int; 2021 Feb; 80():102201. PubMed ID: 33010472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Low accuracy of Bayesian latent class analysis for estimation of herd-level true prevalence under certain disease characteristics-An analysis using simulated data.
McAloon CG; Doherty ML; Whyte P; Verdugo C; Toft N; More SJ; O'Grady L; Green MJ
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jan; 162():117-125. PubMed ID: 30621890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostics for schistosomiasis in Africa and Arabia: a review of present options in control and future needs for elimination.
Stothard JR; Stanton MC; Bustinduy AL; Sousa-Figueiredo JC; Van Dam GJ; Betson M; Waterhouse D; Ward S; Allan F; Hassan AA; Al-Helal MA; Memish ZA; Rollinson D
Parasitology; 2014 Dec; 141(14):1947-61. PubMed ID: 25158604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomarker validation with an imperfect reference: Issues and bounds.
Emerson SC; Waikar SS; Fuentes C; Bonventre JV; Betensky RA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2933-2945. PubMed ID: 28166709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A sequential classification rule based on multiple quantitative tests in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhang J; Zhang Y; Chaloner K; Stapleton JT
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1359-72. PubMed ID: 26522690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of multiple repeated binary tests without a gold standard.
Wang C; Hanson TE
Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(13):2381-2390. PubMed ID: 30815919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A geostatistical framework for combining spatially referenced disease prevalence data from multiple diagnostics.
Amoah B; Diggle PJ; Giorgi E
Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 31449327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy.
van Stralen KJ; Stel VS; Reitsma JB; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
Kidney Int; 2009 Jun; 75(12):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 19340091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
Goetghebeur E; Liinev J; Boelaert M; Van der Stuyft P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. New diagnostic tools in schistosomiasis.
Utzinger J; Becker SL; van Lieshout L; van Dam GJ; Knopp S
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2015 Jun; 21(6):529-42. PubMed ID: 25843503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
