365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33539625)
1. Regression dynamic causal modeling for resting-state fMRI.
Frässle S; Harrison SJ; Heinzle J; Clementz BA; Tamminga CA; Sweeney JA; Gershon ES; Keshavan MS; Pearlson GD; Powers A; Stephan KE
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 May; 42(7):2159-2180. PubMed ID: 33539625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity.
Frässle S; Lomakina EI; Kasper L; Manjaly ZM; Leff A; Pruessmann KP; Buhmann JM; Stephan KE
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():505-529. PubMed ID: 29807151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regression DCM for fMRI.
Frässle S; Lomakina EI; Razi A; Friston KJ; Buhmann JM; Stephan KE
Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():406-421. PubMed ID: 28259780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI.
Almgren H; Van de Steen F; Razi A; Friston K; Marinazzo D
Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116435. PubMed ID: 31816423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-brain estimates of directed connectivity for human connectomics.
Frässle S; Manjaly ZM; Do CT; Kasper L; Pruessmann KP; Stephan KE
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117491. PubMed ID: 33115664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling.
Frässle S; Stephan KE
Netw Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 6(1):135-160. PubMed ID: 35356192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI.
Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between EEG and fMRI connectomes is reproducible across simultaneous EEG-fMRI studies from 1.5T to 7T.
Wirsich J; Jorge J; Iannotti GR; Shamshiri EA; Grouiller F; Abreu R; Lazeyras F; Giraud AL; Gruetter R; Sadaghiani S; Vulliémoz S
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117864. PubMed ID: 33592241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sparse DCM for whole-brain effective connectivity from resting-state fMRI data.
Prando G; Zorzi M; Bertoldo A; Corbetta M; Zorzi M; Chiuso A
Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116367. PubMed ID: 31812714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks.
Elliott ML; Knodt AR; Cooke M; Kim MJ; Melzer TR; Keenan R; Ireland D; Ramrakha S; Poulton R; Caspi A; Moffitt TE; Hariri AR
Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():516-532. PubMed ID: 30708106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI.
Taghia J; Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Cai W; Menon V
Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():271-290. PubMed ID: 28267626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Boost in Test-Retest Reliability in Resting State fMRI with Predictive Modeling.
Taxali A; Angstadt M; Rutherford S; Sripada C
Cereb Cortex; 2021 May; 31(6):2822-2833. PubMed ID: 33447841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elucidating the complementarity of resting-state networks derived from dynamic [
Ionescu TM; Amend M; Hafiz R; Biswal BB; Wehrl HF; Herfert K; Pichler BJ
Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118045. PubMed ID: 33848625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral dynamic causal modelling of resting-state fMRI: an exploratory study relating effective brain connectivity in the default mode network to genetics.
Nie Y; Opoku E; Yasmin L; Song Y; Wang J; Wu S; Scarapicchia V; Gawryluk J; Wang L; Cao J; Nathoo FS
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Aug; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 32866136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Directed functional connectivity using dynamic graphical models.
Schwab S; Harbord R; Zerbi V; Elliott L; Afyouni S; Smith JQ; Woolrich MW; Smith SM; Nichols TE
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():340-353. PubMed ID: 29625233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation and validation of individualized dynamic brain models with resting state fMRI.
Singh MF; Braver TS; Cole MW; Ching S
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117046. PubMed ID: 32603858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain networks, dimensionality, and global signal averaging in resting-state fMRI: Hierarchical network structure results in low-dimensional spatiotemporal dynamics.
Gotts SJ; Gilmore AW; Martin A
Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116289. PubMed ID: 31629827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resting state connectivity differences in eyes open versus eyes closed conditions.
Agcaoglu O; Wilson TW; Wang YP; Stephen J; Calhoun VD
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jun; 40(8):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 30720907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How restful is it with all that noise? Comparison of Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) and conventional imaging in resting-state fMRI.
Andoh J; Ferreira M; Leppert IR; Matsushita R; Pike B; Zatorre RJ
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():726-735. PubMed ID: 27902936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
