102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33540141)
41. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Colposcopic differential diagnosis of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Noda S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Feb; 21(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 6942821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Histogenesis of cervical adenocarcinoma with reference to human papillomavirus-18 as a carcinogen.
Okagaki T; Tase T; Twiggs LB; Carson LF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):639-44. PubMed ID: 2553963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix ("adenoma malignum"). An immunohistochemical comparison with microglandular endocervical hyperplasia and conventional endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Steeper TA; Wick MR
Cancer; 1986 Sep; 58(5):1131-8. PubMed ID: 3524799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors associated with pathologic colposcopic and cytologic changes in 500 clinically asymptomatic women.
Paçarada M; Lulaj S; Kongjeli G; Kongjeli N; Qavdarbasha H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jan; 108(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19782982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cytologic findings in microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix.
Yahr LJ; Lee KR
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 1879260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Biometric research in the diagnosis of precancerous states and endocervical cancer].
Novik VI; Agroskin LS; Papaian GV; Solov'eva LV
Arkh Patol; 1989; 51(12):45-50. PubMed ID: 2629663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a report of 20 cases of a process that may be confused with endocervical glandular dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.
Baker PM; Clement PB; Bell DA; Young RH
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Jul; 18(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 12090586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Microglandular endocervical hyperplasia and endocervical adenocacinoma in pregnant--description of two cases].
Nikolova M; Marinov E; Stoĭkov S; Gorchev G; Tomov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 15853028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The colposcopy and the cone biopsy in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of 81 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Yárnoz MC; Cortés J; Llompart M; Torrecabota J; Rosselló JJ; Amengual E
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1988; 9(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 3391211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia. A benign lesion often confused with adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma).
Jones MA; Young RH; Scully RE
Am J Surg Pathol; 1991 Dec; 15(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 1746679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Clinical evaluation of the dysplasias and the early forms of cervical cancer].
Chebanu FA; Savinova VF; Lukasheva AM
Vopr Onkol; 1977; 23(10):100-2. PubMed ID: 595523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy vs dynamic spectral imaging directed biopsy in correctly identifying the grade of cervical dysplasia in women undergoing conization: A methodological study.
Booth BB; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Johansen T; Mertz H; Dahl K; Bor P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Aug; 99(8):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 32105344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Role of microcolposcopy in the diagnostic evaluation of cervical pre-invasive lesions.
Pasetto N; Piccione E; Sesti F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 34(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 1673943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The value of endocervical curettage in the management of the patient with abnormal cervical cytologic findings.
Grainger DA; Roberts DK; Wells MM; Horbelt DV
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 156(3):625-8. PubMed ID: 3826211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and p53 in the differential diagnosis of glandular lesions of the cervix.
Cina SJ; Richardson MS; Austin RM; Kurman RJ
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 9071723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Carcinoma of the cervix in a pregnant woman with negative Pap smears and colposcopic examination.
Bakri YN; Akhtar M; al-Amri A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1990; 69(7-8):657-8. PubMed ID: 2094152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cytobrush in evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Is cervical curettage necessary?
Frost L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1990; 69(7-8):645-7. PubMed ID: 2094148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
