These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33540191)

  • 1. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
    Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
    Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
    Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Eißmann C; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):847-851. PubMed ID: 33415438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
    Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.
    Kellner H; Horky A; Louwen F; Bahlmann F; Al Naimi A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):485-491. PubMed ID: 38695973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in parturients with previous scar in labor: a cross-sectional study.
    Alalaf SK; Mansour TMM; Sileem SA; Shabila NP
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35568830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):455-460. PubMed ID: 28186617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape.
    Marjolein Bij de Vaate AJ; Linskens IH; van der Voet LF; Twisk JW; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():39-44. PubMed ID: 25770846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of the onset of labor on the characteristics of the cesarean scar.
    Al Naimi A; Jennewein L; Mouzakiti N; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 34077556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prediction and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum].
    Wang LL; Yang HX; Chen JY; Fan LX; Zhang XX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 57(8):587-593. PubMed ID: 36008285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.