138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33540454)
21. Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
Carroll AH; Dowlati E; Molina E; Zhao D; Altshuler M; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 34271544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes.
Ahmadian A; Verma S; Mundis GM; Oskouian RJ; Smith DA; Uribe JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Sep; 19(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 23889186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Sheng SR; Geng YB; Zhou KL; Wu AM; Wang XY; Ni WF
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jan; 9(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 31838875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of stand-alone cage and cage-with-plate for monosegmental cervical fusion and impact of virtual reality in evaluating surgical results.
Zawy Alsofy S; Nakamura M; Ewelt C; Kafchitsas K; Fortmann T; Schipmann S; Suero Molina E; Welzel Saravia H; Stroop R
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Apr; 191():105685. PubMed ID: 32000041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: A STROBE-compliant observational study.
Zhang D; Mao K; Qiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e8011. PubMed ID: 28906383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study.
Wu MH; Dubey NK; Li YY; Lee CY; Cheng CC; Shi CS; Huang TJ
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 28412560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.
Campbell PG; Nunley PD; Cavanaugh D; Kerr E; Utter PA; Frank K; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E6. PubMed ID: 29290128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous posterior fixation for stabilization of lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Gerszten PC; Tobler W; Raley TJ; Miller LE; Block JE; Nasca RJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):E36-40. PubMed ID: 21964453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of lumbosacral sagittal balance parameter variation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time 3D navigation techniques].
Ma CR; Chen HX; Li GJ; He XY; Wang LS; Huang T; Meng ZB
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 33896128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
