These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33541218)
1. Intraosseous vascular access using the EZ-IO can be safely maintained in the adult proximal humerus and proximal tibia for up to 48 h: Report of a clinical study. Philbeck TE; Puga TA; Montez DF; Davlantes C; DeNoia EP; Miller LJ J Vasc Access; 2022 May; 23(3):339-347. PubMed ID: 33541218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study. Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study. Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service. Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model. Lairet J; Bebarta V; Lairet K; Kacprowicz R; Lawler C; Pitotti R; Bush A; King J Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 23331182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature. Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO. Ong MEH; Chan YH; Oh JJ; Ngo AS Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19041528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Two Intraosseous Devices: The NIO Versus the EZ-IO by Novice Users-A Randomized Cross Over Trial. Shina A; Baruch EN; Shlaifer A; Shovali A; Levi M; Yosefy O; Segal D; Bader T; Shavit I; Yitzhak A Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 27870553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal femur versus humeral or tibial IO, access in adult out of hospital cardiac resuscitation. Rayas EG; Winckler C; Bolleter S; Stringfellow M; Miramontes D; Shumaker J; Lewis A; Wampler D Resuscitation; 2022 Jan; 170():11-16. PubMed ID: 34748766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraosseous vascular access for in-hospital emergency use: a systematic clinical review of the literature and analysis. Voigt J; Waltzman M; Lottenberg L Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Feb; 28(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 22307192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service - a quality assurance study. Sørgjerd R; Sunde GA; Heltne JK Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 27(1):15. PubMed ID: 30760297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]