211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33542168)
1. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy.
Grecchi E; Stefanelli LV; Grecchi F; Grivetto F; Franchina A; Pranno N
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():103942. PubMed ID: 34974136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CBCT device dependency on the transfer accuracy from computer-aided implantology procedures.
Dreiseidler T; Tandon D; Kreppel M; Neugebauer J; Mischkowski RA; Zinser MJ; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1089-97. PubMed ID: 22680780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study.
Struwe M; Leontiev W; Connert T; Kühl S; Filippi A; Herber V; Dagassan-Berndt D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of bicortical mini-implants placement site for maxillary skeletal expansion appliances: an in vitro study.
Rodríguez Torres P; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Tzironi G; González Menéndez H; Lorrio Castro J; Lobo Galindo AB; Hernández Montero S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):86. PubMed ID: 36774459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.
Stünkel R; Zeller AN; Bohne T; Böhrnsen F; Wedi E; Raschke D; Kauffmann P
Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Oct; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 36198996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study.
Horsch L; Labis C; Trebing CT; Kronsteiner D; Hilgenfeld T; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103744. PubMed ID: 34252488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Plaster Cast Contact Scan Method to Assess the Accuracy of Full-Arch Computer-Aided Implant Surgery.
Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Ferri A; Pellegrino G; Di Carlo S; De Angelis F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):756-762. PubMed ID: 35904832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.
Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
