These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33543583)

  • 1. Capturing the underlying distribution in meta-analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals.
    Brannick MT; French KA; Rothstein HR; Kiselica AM; Apostoloski N
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):264-290. PubMed ID: 33543583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying uncertainty in the meta-analytic lower bound estimate.
    Brannick MT; Potter S; Teng Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):754-773. PubMed ID: 31094545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.
    Nagashima K; Noma H; Furukawa TA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1689-1702. PubMed ID: 29745296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean correlation corrected for Case IV range restriction: a more adequate procedure for meta-analysis.
    Li JC; Cui Y; Chan W
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 23088495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving coverage probabilities for parametric tolerance intervals via bootstrap calibration.
    Zou Y; Young DS
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(16):2152-2166. PubMed ID: 32249974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling.
    Christman MC; Pontius JS
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):503-10. PubMed ID: 10877310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
    Boedeker P; Henson RK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.