These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3354445)

  • 1. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up.
    Gallo I; Nistal F; Arbe E; Artiñano E
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr; 61(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 3354445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position.
    Nistal F; García-Satué E; Artiñano E; Durán CM; Gallo I
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 57(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 3942062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
    Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves--a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses.
    Reichenspurner H; Weinhold C; Nollert G; Kaulbach HG; Vetter HO; Boehm DH; Reichart B
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 43(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7540324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 10-year comparison of mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock porcine bioprostheses.
    Perier P; Deloche A; Chauvaud S; Chachques JC; Relland J; Fabiani JN; Stephan Y; Blondeau P; Carpentier A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Jul; 48(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2764601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The behavior of pericardial versus porcine valve xenografts in the growing sheep model.
    Gallo I; Nistal F; Artiñano E; Fernández D; Cayón R; Carrión M; García-Martínez V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3807402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double valve Implantation. Long-term evaluation of 8 different bioprostheses.
    Stassano P; Mannacio V; Musumeci A; Golino A; Maida P; Ferrigno V; Buonocore G; Spampinato N
    Tex Heart Inst J; 1991; 18(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15227506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
    Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary tissue valve degeneration in glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprostheses: Hancock I versus Carpentier-Edwards at 4- to 7-years' follow-up.
    Nistal F; Artiñano E; Gallo I
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Nov; 42(5):568-72. PubMed ID: 3778007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Durability of the Hancock MO bioprosthesis compared with standard aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Yun KL; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S221-8. PubMed ID: 7646163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of primary tissue valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. Preliminary results.
    Gallo I; Nistal F; Revuelta JM; Garcia-Satue E; Artiñano E; Duran CG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Aug; 90(2):278-80. PubMed ID: 4021528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do pericardial bioprostheses improve outcome of elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
    Said SM; Ashikhmina E; Greason KL; Suri RM; Park SJ; Daly RC; Burkhart HM; Dearani JA; Sundt TM; Schaff HV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1868-74; discussion 1874-5. PubMed ID: 22440366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
    Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
    Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.