These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33544753)

  • 1. Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.
    Tucker Williams E; Lepczyk CA; Morse W; Smith M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246457. PubMed ID: 33544753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.
    TuckerWilliams E; Lepczyk CA; Morse W; Smith M
    Environ Manage; 2024 May; 73(5):1032-1048. PubMed ID: 38466407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.
    Smith AL; Strickland BK; Leopold BD; Cummins JL; Mayer JJ; Street GM
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117742. PubMed ID: 37001426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a warfarin bait for controlling invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa).
    Beasley JC; Clontz LM; Rakowski A; Snow NP; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jul; 77(7):3057-3067. PubMed ID: 33644948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Field evaluation of low-dose warfarin baits to control wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Texas.
    Poché RM; Poché D; Franckowiak G; Somers DJ; Briley LN; Tseveenjav B; Polyakova L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206070. PubMed ID: 30403690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.
    McLean HE; Teel TL; Bright AD; Jaebker LM; Tomecek JM; Frank MG; Connally RL; Shwiff SA; Carlisle KM
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112143. PubMed ID: 33631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.
    Grady MJ; Harper EE; Carlisle KM; Ernst KH; Shwiff SA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 237():488-494. PubMed ID: 30825781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and risks from a modified sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Wishart JD; Foster JA; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Apr; 77(4):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 33200879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential secondary poisoning risks to non-targets from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for invasive wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Foster JA; VanNatta EH; Horak KE; Humphrys ST; Staples LD; Hewitt DG; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Jan; 74(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 28762643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of invasive wild pig countermeasures using multicriteria decision analysis.
    Brondum MC; Collier ZA; Luke CS; Goatcher BL; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():1164-1173. PubMed ID: 27744261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seasonal efficacy and risks from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Glow MP; Foster JA; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Jul; 80(7):3227-3237. PubMed ID: 38357838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.
    Treichler JW; VerCauteren KC; Taylor CR; Beasley JC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Dec; 79(12):4765-4773. PubMed ID: 37462084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S.
    Fischer JW; Snow NP; Wilson BE; Beckerman SF; Jacques CN; VanNatta EH; Kay SL; VerCauteren KC
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11528. PubMed ID: 32661318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A questionnaire survey for the assessment of wild-domestic pig interactions in a context oedema disease outbreaks among wild boars (Sus scrofa) in South-Eastern France.
    Jori F; Petit G; Civil N; Decors A; Charrier F; Casabianca F; Grosbois V
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2022 Nov; 69(6):4009-4015. PubMed ID: 36083807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-level movement response of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) to removal.
    Bastille-Rousseau G; Schlichting PE; Keiter DA; Smith JB; Kilgo JC; Wittemyer G; Vercauteren KC; Beasley JC; Pepin KM
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jan; 77(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 32738020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of movement behaviors to inform toxic baiting strategies for invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa).
    Lavelle MJ; Snow NP; Halseth JM; VanNatta EH; Sanders HN; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Nov; 74(11):2504-2510. PubMed ID: 29624855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatitis E Virus in Domestic Pigs, Wild Boars, Pig Farm Workers, and Hunters in Estonia.
    Ivanova A; Tefanova V; Reshetnjak I; Kuznetsova T; Geller J; Lundkvist Å; Janson M; Neare K; Velström K; Jokelainen P; Lassen B; Hütt P; Saar T; Viltrop A; Golovljova I
    Food Environ Virol; 2015 Dec; 7(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 26141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods.
    Engeman RM; Massei G; Sage M; Gentle MN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Nov; 20(11):8077-91. PubMed ID: 23881593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes and Beliefs of Pig Farmers and Wild Boar Hunters Towards Reporting of African Swine Fever in Bulgaria, Germany and the Western Part of the Russian Federation.
    Vergne T; Guinat C; Petkova P; Gogin A; Kolbasov D; Blome S; Molia S; Pinto Ferreira J; Wieland B; Nathues H; Pfeiffer DU
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2016 Apr; 63(2):e194-204. PubMed ID: 25100620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure of a population of invasive wild pigs to simulated toxic bait containing biomarker: implications for population reduction.
    Snow NP; Lavelle MJ; Halseth JM; Glow MP; VanNatta EH; Davis AJ; Pepin KM; Tabor RT; Leland BR; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2019 Apr; 75(4):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 30324708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.