130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33545411)
1. Comparison of two automated sperm analyzers using 2 different detection methods versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Chtourou S; Reignier A; Loubersac S; Barrière P; Fréour T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 50(8):102084. PubMed ID: 33545411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision
Engel KM; Grunewald S; Schiller J; Paasch U
Andrologia; 2019 Feb; 51(1):e13149. PubMed ID: 30255510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
Agarwal A; Sharma RK
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated motility and morphology measurement of live spermatozoa.
Dai C; Zhang Z; Jahangiri S; Shan G; Moskovstev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
Andrology; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 33740840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
Peng N; Zou X; Li L
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CASA in the medical laboratory: CASA in diagnostic andrology and assisted conception.
Tomlinson MJ; Naeem A
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun; 30(6):850-859. PubMed ID: 29559071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis: a systematic review.
Finelli R; Leisegang K; Tumallapalli S; Henkel R; Agarwal A
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jul; 10(7):3069-3079. PubMed ID: 34430409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted sperm analysis in dogs and cats: an update after 20 years.
Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Maes D; Nizanski W
Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Dec; 47 Suppl 6():204-7. PubMed ID: 23279500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative boar semen computer-assisted sperm analysis.
Basioura A; Tsousis G; Boscos C; Lymberopoulos A; Tsakmakidis I
Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Oct; 54 Suppl 4():41-45. PubMed ID: 31232479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in CASA output according to the chamber type when analyzing frozen-thawed bull sperm.
Ibănescu I; Leiding C; Ciornei ŞG; Roșca P; Sfartz I; Drugociu D
Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Mar; 166():72-9. PubMed ID: 26791331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two staining techniques on the manual and automated canine sperm morphology analysis.
Surmacz P; Niwinska A; Kautz E; Gizinski S; Faundez R
Reprod Domest Anim; 2022 Jun; 57(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 35212033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of age, clinical conditions, and lifestyle on routine semen parameters and sperm kinematics.
Verón GL; Tissera AD; Bello R; Beltramone F; Estofan G; Molina RI; Vazquez-Levin MH
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul; 110(1):68-75.e4. PubMed ID: 29980266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
