BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33545929)

  • 1. Prediction and analysis of hub genes between glioblastoma and low-grade glioma using bioinformatics analysis.
    Xu B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(3):e23513. PubMed ID: 33545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Single-cell transcriptome analysis of multigrade glioma heterogeneity and immune microenvironment revealed potential prognostic biomarkers].
    Liu J; Xu K; Ma L; Wang Y
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2022 Oct; 38(10):3790-3808. PubMed ID: 36305410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of Hub Gene GRIN1 Correlated with Histological Grade and Prognosis of Glioma by Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis.
    Yang A; Wang X; Hu Y; Shang C; Hong Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():4542995. PubMed ID: 34840971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-negative matrix factorization and differential expression analyses identify hub genes linked to progression and prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme.
    Akçay S; Güven E; Afzal M; Kazmi I
    Gene; 2022 May; 824():146395. PubMed ID: 35283227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of novel prognostic targets in glioblastoma using bioinformatics analysis.
    Yin X; Wu Q; Hao Z; Chen L
    Biomed Eng Online; 2022 Apr; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 35436915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CKS2 (CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 2) is a prognostic biomarker in lower grade glioma: a study based on bioinformatic analysis and immunohistochemistry.
    Hu M; Li Z; Qiu J; Zhang R; Feng J; Hu G; Ren J
    Bioengineered; 2021 Dec; 12(1):5996-6009. PubMed ID: 34494924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular mechanisms underlying gliomas and glioblastoma pathogenesis revealed by bioinformatics analysis of microarray data.
    Vastrad B; Vastrad C; Godavarthi A; Chandrashekar R
    Med Oncol; 2017 Sep; 34(11):182. PubMed ID: 28952134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elevated TYROBP expression predicts poor prognosis and high tumor immune infiltration in patients with low-grade glioma.
    Lu J; Peng Y; Huang R; Feng Z; Fan Y; Wang H; Zeng Z; Ji Y; Wang Y; Wang Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):723. PubMed ID: 34162355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serine Incorporator 2 (SERINC2) Expression Predicts an Unfavorable Prognosis of Low-Grade Glioma (LGG): Evidence from Bioinformatics Analysis.
    Qi C; Lei L; Hu J; Wang G; Liu J; Ou S
    J Mol Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 70(10):1521-1532. PubMed ID: 32642801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioinformatics analyses of significant genes, related pathways and candidate prognostic biomarkers in glioblastoma.
    Zhou L; Tang H; Wang F; Chen L; Ou S; Wu T; Xu J; Guo K
    Mol Med Rep; 2018 Nov; 18(5):4185-4196. PubMed ID: 30132538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of potential crucial genes and molecular mechanisms in glioblastoma multiforme by bioinformatics analysis.
    Chen X; Pan Y; Yan M; Bao G; Sun X
    Mol Med Rep; 2020 Aug; 22(2):859-869. PubMed ID: 32467990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 63 signature genes prediction system is effective for glioblastoma prognosis.
    Zhang Y; Xu J; Zhu X
    Int J Mol Med; 2018 Apr; 41(4):2070-2078. PubMed ID: 29393370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of potential biomarkers related to glioma survival by gene expression profile analysis.
    Hsu JB; Chang TH; Lee GA; Lee TY; Chen CY
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Mar; 11(Suppl 7):34. PubMed ID: 30894197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcriptome analysis revealed CENPF associated with glioma prognosis.
    Zhang M; Zhang Q; Bai J; Zhao Z; Zhang J
    Math Biosci Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(3):2077-2096. PubMed ID: 33892537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Genome-Scale Integrated Analysis to Identify Key Genes and Potential Molecular Mechanisms in Recurrence of Lower-Grade Brain Glioma.
    Deng T; Gong YZ; Wang XK; Liao XW; Huang KT; Zhu GZ; Chen HN; Guo FZ; Mo LG; Li LQ
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 May; 25():3716-3727. PubMed ID: 31104065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening the Significant Hub Genes by Comparing Tumor Cells, Normoxic and Hypoxic Glioblastoma Stem-like Cell Lines Using Co-Expression Analysis in Glioblastoma.
    Güven E; Afzal M; Kazmi I
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-omics analysis predicts fibronectin 1 as a prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma multiforme.
    Kabir F; Apu MNH
    Genomics; 2022 May; 114(3):110378. PubMed ID: 35513291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of Hub Genes of Mesio Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Prognostic Biomarkers of Brain Low-grade Gliomas Based on Bioinformatics Analysis.
    Xu J; Sun M; Wang Y; Xie A; Gao J
    Cell Transplant; 2020; 29():963689720978722. PubMed ID: 33327771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational analysis and verification of molecular genetic targets for glioblastoma.
    Xue L; Liu H; Chen Y; Wei L; Hong J
    Biosci Rep; 2020 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 32469390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of an autophagy-related 10-lncRNA-mRNA signature for distinguishing glioblastoma multiforme from lower‑grade glioma and prognosis prediction.
    Wei B; Wang L; Zhao J
    Gen Physiol Biophys; 2021 Jul; 40(4):257-274. PubMed ID: 34350832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.