These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33546859)
1. Relationships between jaw deformity and the occlusal plane in cone beam computed tomography scans. Teng C; Zhong T; Yu Q J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33546859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity. Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cone beam computed tomography study based on three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of relationships between the lip-line and jaw deformity. Teng C; Zhu J; Wang H; Yu Q Arch Oral Biol; 2022 Sep; 141():105489. PubMed ID: 35772255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images. Nojima K; Yokose T; Ishii T; Kobayashi M; Nishii Y Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2007 Nov; 48(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 18360103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships. Sinobad D J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):489-98. PubMed ID: 3244056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Relationship between occlusal plane and masticatory path in youth with individual normal occlusion]. Lin XF; Li SH; Huang ZS; Wu XY Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 45(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 21163016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Tanaka EM; Sato S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography]. Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam computed tomography imaging of sagittal positions of the mandibular prominence and maxillary central incisors in adult Chinese Han men as an aesthetic profile determinant. Miao P; Gao J; Lu Z; Jin Z Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Oct; 99(43):e22778. PubMed ID: 33120788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion. Raber A; Kula K; Ghoneima A Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 31015017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Lip Line Cant Change After 1-Jaw and 2-Jaw Surgery. Lee UL; Nam JH; Choi WC; Kim HW; Kim HJ; Choi YJ J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1820-1824. PubMed ID: 31033678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S; Tsukada H; Sato Y Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 10593444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the location of the human mandibular foramen as a function of growth and vertical facial type. Epars JF; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jul; 73(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 25330162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on cephalometric diagnosis. Paula LK; Solon-de-Mello Pde A; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 25992984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear evaluation of the development of sagittal jaw relationship. Williams S; Leighton BC; Nielsen JH Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 3862346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography. Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occlusal Angles of Equine Incisors. Listmann L; Schrock P; Failing K; Staszyk C J Vet Dent; 2017 Dec; 34(4):259-267. PubMed ID: 29130414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of masticatory movement in relation to inclination of occlusal plane. Ogawa T; Koyano K; Suetsugu T J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):652-7. PubMed ID: 9357745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]