These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33548381)

  • 1. Standard and emerging CMR methods for mitral regurgitation quantification.
    Fidock B; Archer G; Barker N; Elhawaz A; Al-Mohammad A; Rothman A; Hose R; Hall IR; Grech E; Briffa N; Lewis N; van der Geest RJ; Zhang JM; Zhong L; Swift AJ; Wild JM; De Gárate E; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Bax JJ; Plein S; Myerson S; Garg P
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 May; 331():316-321. PubMed ID: 33548381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct mitral regurgitation quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 4D flow CMR jet tracking: evaluation in comparison to conventional CMR.
    Gupta AN; Avery R; Soulat G; Allen BD; Collins JD; Choudhury L; Bonow RO; Carr J; Markl M; Elbaz MSM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Dec; 23(1):138. PubMed ID: 34865629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Crelier G; Lindemann F; Fahr F; Czaja-Ziolkowska M; Sieg F; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Borger MA; Paetsch I
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jul; 23(1):87. PubMed ID: 34233708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grading mitral regurgitation using 4D flow CMR: Comparison to transthoracic echocardiography.
    Ribeyrolles S; Monin JL; Rohnean A; Diakov C; Caussin C; Monnot S; Berrebi A; Paul JF
    Echocardiography; 2022 Jun; 39(6):783-793. PubMed ID: 35536700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of mitral regurgitation by 3-dimensional proximal flow convergence using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with echo-Doppler.
    Gorodisky L; Agmon Y; Porat M; Abadi S; Lessick J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):793-802. PubMed ID: 29260346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with standard imaging planes for mitral valve scallop pathology: interrater agreement and comparison with echocardiography.
    Søgaard SB; Gustavsen P; Dalsgaard M; Vejlstrup NG; Madsen PL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):605-611. PubMed ID: 32970297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a comparison of indirect quantification methods.
    Polte CL; Bech-Hanssen O; Johnsson ÅA; Gao SA; Lagerstrand KM
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 26001380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitral valve regurgitation assessed by intraventricular CMR 4D-flow: a systematic review on the technological aspects and potential clinical applications.
    Safarkhanlo Y; Jung B; Bernhard B; Peper ES; Kwong RY; Bastiaansen JAM; Gräni C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Oct; 39(10):1963-1977. PubMed ID: 37322317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mitral regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging during continuous in-scanner exercise: a feasibility study.
    Gorecka M; Craven TP; Jex N; Chew PG; Dobson LE; Brown LAE; Higgins DM; Thirunavukarasu S; Sharrack N; Javed W; Kotha S; Giannoudi M; Procter H; Parent M; Schlosshan D; Swoboda PP; Plein S; Levelt E; Greenwood JP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1543-1553. PubMed ID: 38780711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CMR predictors of mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse.
    Delling FN; Kang LL; Yeon SB; Kissinger KV; Goddu B; Manning WJ; Han Y
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1037-45. PubMed ID: 20947049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct measurement of atrioventricular valve regurgitant jets using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance is accurate and reliable for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Jacobs K; Rigdon J; Chan F; Cheng JY; Alley MT; Vasanawala S; Maskatia SA
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 May; 22(1):33. PubMed ID: 32404159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.
    Kon MW; Myerson SG; Moat NE; Pennell DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15311866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome.
    Chew PG; Dobson LE; Garg P; Fairbairn TA; Musa TA; Uddin A; Swoboda PP; Foley JR; Fent GJ; Brown LAE; Onciul S; Plein S; Blackman DJ; Greenwood JP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 35(1):161-170. PubMed ID: 30182320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains reproducible between software solutions.
    Grafton-Clarke C; Thornton G; Fidock B; Archer G; Hose R; van der Geest RJ; Zhong L; Swift AJ; Wild JM; De Gárate E; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Plein S; Treibel TA; Flather M; Vassiliou VS; Garg P
    Wellcome Open Res; 2021; 6():253. PubMed ID: 37250619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hamilton-Craig C; Strugnell W; Gaikwad N; Ischenko M; Speranza V; Chan J; Neill J; Platts D; Scalia GM; Burstow DJ; Walters DL
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jul; 4(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 26309843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of mitral regurgitation severity appears better than echocardiographic imaging.
    Hassan AKM; Algowhary MI; Kishk AYT; Youssef AAA; Razik NA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):889-897. PubMed ID: 32016882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sköldborg V; Madsen PL; Dalsgaard M; Abdulla J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):279-289. PubMed ID: 31664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac remodelling and function with primary mitral valve insufficiency studied by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Aplin M; Kyhl K; Bjerre J; Ihlemann N; Greenwood JP; Plein S; Uddin A; Tønder N; Høst NB; Ahlström MG; Hove J; Hassager C; Iversen K; Vejlstrup NG; Lav Madsen P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Aug; 17(8):863-70. PubMed ID: 26758406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of mitral regurgitation using transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    ElTahlawy WM; Ragab TM; Elkhashab KA; Ebeid HM
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2021 Mar; 22(1):215-223. PubMed ID: 33792265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.