These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33548585)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction processes for DNA-based identification from putrefied bodies in forensic routine work.
    Uerlings S; Welter V; Madea B; Grabmüller M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110707. PubMed ID: 33548585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic identification of highly putrefied bodies using DNA from soft tissues.
    Schwark T; Heinrich A; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Nov; 125(6):891-4. PubMed ID: 21170545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of STR Typing Success Rate in Soft Tissues from Putrefied Bodies Based on a Quantitative Grading System for Putrefaction.
    Courts C; Sauer E; Hofmann Y; Madea B; Schyma C
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):1016-21. PubMed ID: 25808732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The auditory ossicles as a DNA source for genetic identification of highly putrefied cadavers.
    Schwark T; Modrow JH; Steinmeier E; Poetsch M; Hasse J; Fischer H; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 May; 129(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 25794688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies.
    Helm K; Matzenauer C; Neuhuber F; Monticelli F; Meyer H; Pittner S; Gotsmy W
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jul; 135(4):1319-1327. PubMed ID: 33880634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
    Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
    Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toenails as an alternative source material for the extraction of DNA from decomposed human remains.
    Schlenker A; Grimble K; Azim A; Owen R; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jan; 258():1-10. PubMed ID: 26610200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental Forensic Kit (DFK®) and Quick Extract™ FFPE DNA extraction kit, a new workflow for obtaining dental DNA for human genetic identity.
    Inostroza C; Carrasco P; Godoy M; Gatti G; Paulino B
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Jul; 73():101992. PubMed ID: 32658750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.
    Vernarecci S; Ottaviani E; Agostino A; Mei E; Calandro L; Montagna P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():77-85. PubMed ID: 25544252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Quantifiler(®) Trio and InnoQuant™ human DNA quantification kits for detection of DNA degradation in developed and aged fingerprints.
    Goecker ZC; Swiontek SE; Lakhtakia A; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():132-138. PubMed ID: 27107968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.
    Holmes AS; Houston R; Elwick K; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 29177703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and quantity of extracted deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) from preserved soft tissues of putrefied unidentifiable human corpse.
    Pooniya S; Lalwani S; Raina A; Millo T; Dogra TD
    J Lab Physicians; 2014 Jan; 6(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 24696558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification procedures as a part of death investigation in Turkey.
    Uzün I; Daregenli O; Sirin G; Müslümanoğlu O
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22133646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-mortem CT and MR brain imaging of putrefied corpses.
    Tschui J; Jackowski C; Schwendener N; Schyma C; Zech WD
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jul; 130(4):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 27225392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative and qualitative study of STR DNA from ethanol and formalin fixed tissues.
    Alqaydi M; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():18-29. PubMed ID: 26963697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA extraction method from bones using Maxwell® 16.
    Karija Vlahović M; Kubat M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Sep; 14(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 22626613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing DNA recovery and forensic typing of degraded blood and dental remains using a specialized extraction method, comprehensive qPCR sample characterization, and massively parallel sequencing.
    Carrasco P; Inostroza C; Didier M; Godoy M; Holt CL; Tabak J; Loftus A
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 31414202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of commercial kits for dual extraction of DNA and RNA from human body fluids.
    Schweighardt AJ; Tate CM; Scott KA; Harper KA; Robertson JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 25284026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of InnoQuant
    Martins C; Ferreira PM; Carvalho R; Costa SC; Farinha C; Azevedo L; Amorim A; Oliveira M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():61-65. PubMed ID: 30578984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.