BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33548889)

  • 1. Breast cancers observed in transplant patients in a single institution.
    Anderson TL; Brandts HM; Gunderson T; Fazzio RT; Hunt KN; Heimbach JK; Glazebrook KN
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Aug; 76():26-29. PubMed ID: 33548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers.
    Irvin VL; Zhang Z; Simon MS; Chlebowski RT; Luoh SW; Shadyab AH; Krok-Schoen JL; Tabung FK; Qi L; Stefanick ML; Schedin P; Jindal S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jun; 3(6):e207227. PubMed ID: 32602908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
    Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.
    Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
    Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.
    Duffy SW; Mackay J; Thomas S; Anderson E; Chen TH; Ellis I; Evans G; Fielder H; Fox R; Gui G; Macmillan D; Moss S; Rogers C; Sibbering M; Wallis M; Warren R; Watson E; Whynes D; Allgood P; Caunt J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. PubMed ID: 23489892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
    Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R10. PubMed ID: 22230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.
    Neal CH; Rahman WT; Joe AI; Noroozian M; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):228-234. PubMed ID: 29091007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.