98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33548889)
21. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammography Trends in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal.
Jha A; Chaudhary RK
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2021 Jan; 18(4):667-671. PubMed ID: 33510507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Yood MU; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Mouchawar J; Leyden WA; Altaras R; Beverly RK; Casso D; Westbrook EO; Bischoff K; Zapka JG; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1518-27. PubMed ID: 15494602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer.
Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Finder C; Mandelson MT; Houn F; White E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 11906848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.
Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of interval breast cancers with 2D digital mammography versus 3D digital breast tomosynthesis in a large community-based practice.
Winter AM; Kazmi S; Hardy AK; Bennett DL
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1953-1959. PubMed ID: 33064341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers.
Huh S; Suh HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Moon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1027-1035. PubMed ID: 32691538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New mammography screening performance metrics based on the entire screening episode.
Sprague BL; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Perry H; Tosteson AAN; Kerlikowske K
Cancer; 2020 Jul; 126(14):3289-3296. PubMed ID: 32374471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study.
FH01 collaborative teams
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1127-34. PubMed ID: 21093374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.
Zahl PH; Maehlen J; Welch HG
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 168(21):2311-6. PubMed ID: 19029493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
