These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33549133)

  • 1. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Luo R; Zheng F; Zhang H; Zhu W; He P; Liu D
    Trials; 2021 Feb; 22(1):121. PubMed ID: 33549133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress, challenges, and future perspectives of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review.
    Wu H; Xue D; Deng M; Guo R; Li H
    BMC Surg; 2024 Sep; 24(1):255. PubMed ID: 39261821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms.
    Yao H; Li T; Chen W; Lei S; Liu K; Liu B; Zhou J
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9818. PubMed ID: 33972632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
    Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.
    Ye SP; Yu HX; Liu DN; Lu WJ; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):196. PubMed ID: 37403084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus small-incision assisted laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy.
    Yu M; Cai Z; Zhou H; Fingerhut A; He Z; Xue P; Song H; Yang X; Cheng X; Zhang S; Xu X; Zhong H; Abuduaini N; Liu J; Wang X; Feng B
    Future Oncol; 2023 Dec; 19(40):2641-2650. PubMed ID: 38108112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
    Houqiong J; Ziwen W; Chonghan Z; Penghui H; Hongxin Y; Weijie L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
    Front Surg; 2023; 10():1092128. PubMed ID: 36874472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of the safety and effectiveness of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumors through systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang WL; Li S; Liu XJ
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Oct; 18(1):374. PubMed ID: 39427105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Jin J; Shi Y; Chen M; Qian J; Qin K; Wang Z; Chen W; Jin W; Lu F; Li Z; Wu Z; Jian L; Han B; Liang X; Sun C; Wu Z; Mou Y; Yin X; Huang H; Chen H; Gemenetzis G; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
    Trials; 2021 Dec; 22(1):954. PubMed ID: 34961558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Advances of minimally invasive technique in colorectal cancer surgery].
    Wang X
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 27353095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis.
    Liu D; Luo R; Wan Z; Zhu W; He P; Ye S; Tang C; Lei X; Li T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12848. PubMed ID: 32733103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled study].
    Chen ZZ; Ding ZJ; Wang ZF; Xu SZ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 26(8):768-772. PubMed ID: 37574293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Advantages of organ protection in colorectal tumor specimen collection through natural orifice specimen extraction surgery].
    Guan X; Wang XS
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):500-504. PubMed ID: 35754214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protocol of the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC): a non-randomized, 24-month, multicenter study comparing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery for radical cystectomy in bladder cancer.
    Porreca A; Palmer K; Artibani W; Antonelli A; Bianchi L; Brunocilla E; Bocciardi AM; Brausi M; Busetto GM; Carini M; Carrieri G; Celia A; Cindolo L; Cochetti G; Colombo R; De Berardinis E; De Cobelli O; Di Maida F; Ercolino A; Gaboardi F; Galfano A; Gallina A; Gallucci M; Introini C; Mearini E; Minervini A; Montorsi F; Musi G; Pini G; Schiavina R; Secco S; Serni S; Simeone C; Tasso G; D'Agostino D
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 33430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of safety and effectiveness between natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection through systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang L; Wang JQ
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Oct; 18(1):360. PubMed ID: 39361096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical resection for diverticulitis using robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction approach: the NICE procedure.
    Minjares RO; Dimas BA; Ghabra S; LeFave JJ; Haas EM
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):517-523. PubMed ID: 31506878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Bosscha K; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Tran TCK; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
    Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
    Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.