103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33549991)
1. Adjusted binary classification (ABC) model in forensic science: An example on sex classification from handprint dimensions.
Jerković I; Kolić A; Kružić I; Anđelinović Š; Bašić Ž
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110709. PubMed ID: 33549991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of sex from hand and handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population.
Ishak NI; Hemy N; Franklin D
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):154.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22578812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting posterior probabilities to meet predefined accuracy criteria: A proposal for a novel approach to osteometric sex estimation.
Jerković I; Bašić Ž; Anđelinović Š; Kružić I
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jun; 311():110273. PubMed ID: 32272305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A methodological comparison of discriminant function analysis and binary logistic regression for estimating sex in forensic research and case-work.
Rani D; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Med Sci Law; 2023 Jul; 63(3):227-236. PubMed ID: 36366800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Human gender determination based on the measurements of handprints that are devoid of dermatoglyphic features].
Grigor'eva MA
Sud Med Ekspert; 2019; 62(4):22-29. PubMed ID: 31407702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method.
Marlow EJ; Pastor RF
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 20735699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex estimation: a comparison of techniques based on binary logistic, probit and cumulative probit regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classification using ordinal variables.
Nikita E; Nikitas P
Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):1213-1225. PubMed ID: 31444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs.
Kranioti EF; Vorniotakis N; Galiatsou C; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):113.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19443150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of the Adjusted Binary Classification (ABC) Approach in Osteometric Sex Estimation: A Comparative Study of Different Linear Machine Learning Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes.
Attia MH; Kholief MA; Zaghloul NM; Kružić I; Anđelinović Š; Bašić Ž; Jerković I
Biology (Basel); 2022 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 35741437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population specificity of sex estimation from vertebrae.
Hora M; Sládek V
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():279.e1-279.e12. PubMed ID: 30236909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs.
Caple JM; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():352-362. PubMed ID: 29957511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample.
Mestekova S; Bruzek J; Veleminska J; Chaumoitre K
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 26258990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods.
Avent PR; Hughes CE; Garvin HM
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 34799862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical sex determination from craniometrics: Comparison of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machines.
Santos F; Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():204.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25459272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of sex from the upper limb measurements of Sudanese adults.
Ahmed AA
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1041-7. PubMed ID: 24237816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex estimation of the tibia in modern Turkish: A computed tomography study.
Ekizoglu O; Er A; Bozdag M; Akcaoglu M; Can IO; García-Donas JG; Kranioti EF
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Nov; 23():89-94. PubMed ID: 27890111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis.
Gonzalez PN; Bernal V; Perez SI
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):68-74. PubMed ID: 19442464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia.
Kotěrová A; Velemínská J; Dupej J; Brzobohatá H; Pilný A; Brůžek J
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):251-261. PubMed ID: 27437698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing the effectiveness of two cranial base foramina for metric sex assessment of fragmentary remains.
Macaluso PJ
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1017-21. PubMed ID: 22390305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
