These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33550248)

  • 1. Prognostic factors and prediction models for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review.
    Ren Y; Huang S; Li Q; Liu C; Li L; Tan J; Zou K; Sun X
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042435. PubMed ID: 33550248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
    Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of critical care prognostic scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
    Haniffa R; Isaam I; De Silva AP; Dondorp AM; De Keizer NF
    Crit Care; 2018 Jan; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 29373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.
    Slieker RC; van der Heijden AAWA; Siddiqui MK; Langendoen-Gort M; Nijpels G; Herings R; Feenstra TL; Moons KGM; Bell S; Elders PJ; 't Hart LM; Beulens JWJ
    BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n2134. PubMed ID: 34583929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
    Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction models for perineal lacerations during childbirth: A systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Hu Y; Lu H; Ren L; Yang M; Shen M; Huang J; Huang Q; Fu L
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2023 Sep; 145():104546. PubMed ID: 37423201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
    He B; Chen W; Liu L; Hou Z; Zhu H; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Zhan S; Wang S
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():654454. PubMed ID: 34026714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of poor outcome in patients with acute liver failure-systematic review of prediction models.
    Wlodzimirow KA; Eslami S; Chamuleau RA; Nieuwoudt M; Abu-Hanna A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50952. PubMed ID: 23272081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review of prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in adults.
    Peetluk LS; Ridolfi FM; Rebeiro PF; Liu D; Rolla VC; Sterling TR
    BMJ Open; 2021 Mar; 11(3):e044687. PubMed ID: 33653759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the development and validation of empirically-derived prognostic models for pressure ulcer risk assessment: A systematic review.
    Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Jan; 89():88-103. PubMed ID: 30352322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction model of acute kidney injury after different types of acute aortic dissection based on machine learning.
    Xinsai L; Zhengye W; Xuan H; Xueqian C; Kai P; Sisi C; Xuyan J; Suhua L
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():984772. PubMed ID: 36211563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple Death Risk Models to Predict In-hospital Outcomes in Acute Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department.
    Xing L; Zhou Y; Han Y; Chen C; Dong Z; Zheng X; Chen D; Yu Y; Liao F; Guo S; Yao C; Tang M; Gu G
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():890567. PubMed ID: 35677829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic models for mortality after cardiac surgery in patients with infective endocarditis: a systematic review and aggregation of prediction models.
    Fernandez-Felix BM; Barca LV; Garcia-Esquinas E; Correa-Pérez A; Fernández-Hidalgo N; Muriel A; Lopez-Alcalde J; Álvarez-Diaz N; Pijoan JI; Ribera A; Elorza EN; Muñoz P; Fariñas MDC; Goenaga MÁ; Zamora J
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Oct; 27(10):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 34620380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Development and validation on death risk model of Stanford type A aortic dissection based on Cox regression].
    Guo Z; Huang S; Wu Q; Xiao Y; Li M; Zhou Q; Lang X; Feng D
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Nov; 33(11):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 34980300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
    Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic models for complete recovery in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jampathong N; Laopaiboon M; Rattanakanokchai S; Pattanittum P
    BMC Neurol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 29523104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of statistical methods used in prognostic prediction models for obstetric care: A 10 year-span cross-sectional study.
    Tan J; Liu C; Yang M; Xiong Y; Huang S; Qi Y; Chen M; Thabane L; Liu X; He L; Sun X
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):611-620. PubMed ID: 38140844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.